Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983558›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2022

The Role of Clearinghouses in Promoting Transparent Research: A Methodological Study of Transparency Practices for Preventive Interventions.

Pamela R Buckley, Charles R Ebersole, Christine M Steeger, Laura E Michaelson, Karl G Hill, Frances Gardner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. AI-Augmented Clearinghouse to Facilitate Evidence-Based Decision-Making and Social Spending: a Conceptual Framework.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Centering Community in Evidence-Based Prevention: Enhancing Evidence Criteria and Processes Across a State-Level Prevention System.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Open Science Standards at Journals that Inform Evidence-Based Policy.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Review
  7. Evidence Clearinghouses as Tools to Advance Health Equity: What We Know from a Systematic Scan.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023
    Review
  8. Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  9. Clearinghouse Standards of Evidence on the Transparency, Openness, and Reproducibility of Intervention Evaluations.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2022
    Article
  10. Common Methodological Problems in Randomized Controlled Trials of Preventive Interventions.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pamela R BuckleyInstitute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA. pamela.buckley@colorado.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8268-3524
Charles R EbersoleUniversity of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8607-2579
Christine M SteegerInstitute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5898-0561
Laura E MichaelsonAmerican Institutes of Research, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0321-025X
Karl G HillInstitute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, 80309, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8342-1561
Frances GardnerCentre for Evidence-Based Intervention, Department of Social Policy & Intervention, Oxford University, Oxford, England.ORCID 0000-0001-7508-7348

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transparency of research methods is vital to science, though incentives are variable, with only some journals and funders adopting transparency policies. Clearinghouses are also important stakeholders; however, to date none have implemented formal procedures that facilitate transparent research. Using data from the longest standing clearinghouse, we examine transparency practices for preventive interventions to explore the role of online clearinghouses in incentivizing researchers to make their research more transparent. We conducted a descriptive analysis of 88 evaluation reports reviewed in 2018-2019 by Blueprints for Healthy Youth Development, when the clearinghouse began checking for trial registrations, and expanded on these efforts by applying broader transparency standards to interventions eligible for an endorsement on the Blueprints website during the study period. Reports were recent, with 84% published between 2010 and 2019. We found that few reports had data, code, or research materials that were publicly available. Meanwhile, 40% had protocols that were registered, but only 8% were registered prospectively, while one-quarter were registered before conducting analyses. About one-third included details in a registered protocol describing the treatment contrast and planned inclusions, and less than 5% had a registered statistical analysis plan (e.g., planned analytical methods, pre-specified covariates). Confirmatory research was distinguished from exploratory work in roughly 40% of reports. Reports published more recently (after 2015) had higher rates of transparency. Preventive intervention research needs to be more transparent. Since clearinghouses rely on robust findings to make well-informed decisions and researchers are incentivized to meet clearinghouse standards, clearinghouses should consider policies that encourage transparency to improve the credibility of evidence-based interventions.

Indexed as

Research DesignResearch ReportAdolescentHumansClearinghousesOpen badges systemPreregistrationRegistriesScoping reviewTOP guidelinesTransparencyTrial registration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.