ArticleArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2022
STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening.
Article in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Simultaneous correction of leg length discrepancy and angular deformity of the distal femur with retrograde Precice nails: a retrospective analysis of 45 patients.Acta orthopaedica · 2024Article
- Letter to the editor on "STRYDE versus PRECICE magnetic internal lengthening nail for femur lengthening".Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2022Article
- Establishing content validity of LIMB-Q Kids: a new patient-reported outcome measure for lower limb deformities.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Focal osteolysis and corrosion at the junction of Precice Stryde intramedullary lengthening device : preliminary clinical, radiological, and metallurgic analysis of 57 lengthened segments.Bone & joint research · 2021Article
- Precice Stryde® Magnetic Internal Lengthening Nail does not Impair Bone Healing Despite Radiographic and Clinical Symptoms.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionArticle
- Early Weight-bearing Accelerates Regenerate Bone Mineralisation: A Pilot Study Comparing Two Post-operative Weight-bearing Protocols Following Intramedullary Limb Lengthening Using the Pixel Value Ratio.Strategies in trauma and limb reconstructionArticle
- Mechanism Failures in Externally Controlled Motorized Intramedullary Lengthening Nails: A Systematic Review.JB & JS open accessReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMagnetic internal lengthening nails (MILNs) have been used for femoral lengthening to avoid complications associated with external fixation. The titanium version of the MILN (PRECICE
methodsA single-center, retrospective cohort study was conducted in which patients' records were reviewed from the period from January 2017 to March 2020. A total of 66 femoral lengthening procedures were included in the study and were divided into two groups: STRYDE
resultsNo statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in regard to the (LD-SRS) score, hip ROM, or knee ROM. Statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in regard to BHI (average of 0.84 months/cm and 0.67 months/cm for STRYDE
conclusionThe STRYDE LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Therapeutic study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.