Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983519›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2021

Effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy on lymph nodes in rectal adenocarcinoma.

Guillaume Chotard, Maylis Capdepont, Quentin Denost, Denis Smith, Véronique Vendrely, Eric Rullier, Anne Rullier

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Guillaume ChotardDepartment of Pathology, Pellegrin Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France.
Maylis CapdepontDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Quentin DenostDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Denis SmithDepartment of Medical Oncology, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Véronique VendrelyDepartment of Radiotherapy, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Eric RullierDepartment of Colorectal Surgery, Haut-Lévêque Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Anne RullierDepartment of Pathology, Pellegrin Hospital, CHU Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076, Bordeaux, France. anne.rullier@chu-bordeaux.fr.
Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque · FRHôpital Pellegrin · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pathological nodal stage, determination of which requires examination of ≥ 12 lymph nodes, is one of the main prognostic factors in rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may reduce the number of both lymph nodes retrieved and positive lymph nodes. Induction chemotherapy before CRT aimed at reducing the rate of distant metastases. However, the impact of this new treatment on number of lymph nodes retrieved and positive lymph nodes is unknown. This study was performed to evaluate the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on lymph nodes in locally advanced rectal cancer treated by CRT. We retrospectively included patients with T2 - 4 Nx M0 rectal cancer and compared those receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus CRT with those receiving CRT alone. From 2012 to 2019, 85 patients were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy + CRT and 189 with CRT alone. The number of lymph nodes retrieved (19 vs. 17, respectively, P = 0.434), the rate of specimens with ≥ 12 lymph nodes (92% vs. 88%, respectively, P = 0.397), and the median number of positive lymph nodes (1 vs. 2, respectively, P = 0.878) were similar between the two groups. However, the rate of pN0 was higher after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + CRT compared to CRT (75% vs. 62%, respectively, P = 0.030). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before CRT for locally advanced rectal cancer did not modify the number of lymph nodes retrieved or the number of positive lymph nodes compared to CRT alone. However, it significantly increased the rate of tumors without any positive lymph nodes (ypN0).

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsChemoradiotherapyFemaleFranceHumansLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingRectal NeoplasmsRectumInduction chemotherapyLymph nodeRadiochemotherapyRectal cancerTotal neoadjuvant treatment

Identifiers

PMID33983519
OpenAlexW3160587827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.