ReviewSkeletal radiology2022
Artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging: a perspective on value propositions, clinical use, and obstacles.
Review in Skeletal radiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Best fast MRI protocols for the knee: advantages and limitations.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- AI in Musculoskeletal Imaging: An End-to-End Perspective.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-driven assessment of sarcopenia in orthopedic geriatrics: technical progress and clinical implications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- Arthroscopy-validated diagnostic performance of sub-5-min deep learning super-resolution 3T knee MRI in children and adolescents.Skeletal radiology · 2025Article
- Current and future role of CT and advanced CT applications in inflammatory arthritis in the clinic and trials.Skeletal radiology · 2025Review
- Defining the value proposition in diagnostic technology: challenges and opportunities for its understanding and development - a review with a multiperspective reflective analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Reading Times of Common Musculoskeletal MRI Examinations: A Survey Study.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Article
- Modern acceleration in musculoskeletal MRI: applications, implications, and challenges.Skeletal radiology · 2024Review
- Advanced deep learning-based image reconstruction in lumbar spine MRI at 0.55 T - Effects on image quality and acquisition time in comparison to conventional deep learning-based reconstruction.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
- Assessing radiologists' and radiographers' perceptions on artificial intelligence integration: opportunities and challenges.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Deep-learning for automated detection of MSU deposits on DECT: evaluating impact on efficiency and reader confidence.Frontiers in radiology · 2024Article
- How AI May Transform Musculoskeletal Imaging.Radiology · 2024Review
- Editorial: Advances in musculoskeletal imaging.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
- HLA-B*27 and Ankylosing Spondylitis: 50 Years of Insights and Discoveries.Current rheumatology reports · 2023Review
- Musculoskeletal ultrasound: a technical and historical perspective.Journal of ultrasonography · 2023Article
- Rapid lumbar MRI protocol using 3D imaging and deep learning reconstruction.Skeletal radiology · 2023Article
- Fully automated measurement on coronal alignment of lower limbs using deep convolutional neural networks on radiographic images.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2022Article
- Radiomics of Musculoskeletal Sarcomas: A Narrative Review.Journal of imaging · 2022Review
- Artificial intelligence-based automatic assessment of lower limb torsion on MRI.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence and deep learning (DL) offer musculoskeletal radiology exciting possibilities in multiple areas, including image reconstruction and transformation, tissue segmentation, workflow support, and disease detection. Novel DL-based image reconstruction algorithms correcting aliasing artifacts, signal loss, and noise amplification with previously unobtainable effectiveness are prime examples of how DL algorithms deliver promised value propositions in musculoskeletal radiology. The speed of DL-based tissue segmentation promises great efficiency gains that may permit the inclusion of tissue compositional-based information routinely into radiology reports. Similarly, DL algorithms give rise to a myriad of opportunities for workflow improvements, including intelligent and adaptive hanging protocols, speech recognition, report generation, scheduling, precertification, and billing. The value propositions of disease-detecting DL algorithms include reduced error rates and increased productivity. However, more studies using authentic clinical workflow settings are necessary to fully understand the value of DL algorithms for disease detection in clinical practice. Successful workflow integration and management of multiple algorithms are critical for translating the value propositions of DL algorithms into clinical practice but represent a major roadblock for which solutions are critically needed. While there is no consensus about the most sustainable business model, radiology departments will need to carefully weigh the benefits and disadvantages of each commercially available DL algorithm. Although more studies are needed to understand the value and impact of DL algorithms on clinical practice, DL technology will likely play an important role in the future of musculoskeletal imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33983500What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.