ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2021
Parametric-based feature selection via spherical harmonic coefficients for the left ventricle myocardial infarction screening.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Self-organizing network representation of human heart.Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) of heart diseases using machine learning techniques has recently received much attention. In this study, we present a novel parametric-based feature selection method using the three-dimensional spherical harmonic (SHs) shape descriptors of the left ventricle (LV) for intelligent myocardial infarction (MI) classification. The main hypothesis is that the SH coefficients of the parameterized endocardial shapes in MI patients are recognizable and distinguishable from healthy subjects. The SH parameterization, expansion, and registration of the LV endocardial shapes were performed, then parametric-based features were extracted. The proposed method performance was investigated by varying considered phases (i.e., the end-systole (ES) or the end-diastole (ED) frames), the spatial alignment procedures based on three modes (i.e., the center of the apical (CoA), the center of mass (CoM), and the center of the basal (CoB)), and considered orders of SH coefficients. After applying principal component analysis (PCA) on the feature vectors, support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (K-NN), and random forest (RF) were trained and tested using the leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). The proposed method validation was performed via a dataset containing healthy and MI subjects selected from the automated cardiac diagnosis challenge (ACDC) database. The promising results show the effectiveness of the proposed classification model. SVM reached the best performance with accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F-score of 97.50%, 95.00%, 100.00%, and 97.56%, respectively, using the introduced optimum feature set. This study demonstrates the robustness of combining the SH coefficients and machine learning techniques. We also quantify and notably highlight the contribution of different parameters in the classification and finally introduce an optimal feature set with maximum discriminant strength for the MI classification task. Moreover, the obtained results confirm that the proposed method performs more accurately than conventional point-based methods and also the current start-of-the-art, i.e., clinical measures. We showed our method's generalizability using employing it in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) detection and achieving promising results too. Parametric-based feature selection via spherical harmonics coefficients for the left ventricle myocardial infarction screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33983494What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.