ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022
Non-anatomic tunnel position increases the risk of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
47 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technology-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves tunnel placement but leads to no change in clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2023Pooled it
- No difference in osteoarthritis, but less graft failures after 5 years, comparing anatomic double-bundle to anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Trial
- Superior accuracy of femoral bone tunnel drilling in robot-assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Trial
- [Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with fluoroscopically controlled positioning of the femoral and tibial bone tunnel].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2026Review
- Anatomic Transtibial Tunnel Placement Using an Initial 6-mm Drill Bit for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthroscopy techniques · 2026Article
- No single best technique: trade-offs in femoral interference screw fixation for bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Consistency of Subcortical Osseous Structures in Femoral Cruciate Ligament Attachment Sites: A Combined 3D-CT and Histological Anatomical Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- ACL reconstruction in football players: A nationwide Swedish registry study of anteromedial versus transtibial femoral tunnel techniques.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- A lower talar tunnel placement is associated with postoperative recurrent sprain in CLAI patients following anatomic reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- A higher posterior tibial slope and tunnel malposition do not predispose to non-traumatic anterior cruciate ligament failure.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Article
- Research progress on the application of mixed reality technology in femoral tunnel positioning during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- No Difference in 10- to 14-Year Outcomes After Modified Transtibial Versus Anteromedial Portal Techniques in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- A flat posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction restores native knee kinematics, comparable to a double-bundle reconstruction-A biomechanical robotic investigation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- The posterior femoral cartilage can be used as an anatomical reference for the creation of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Specific fibre areas in the femoral footprint of the posterior cruciate ligament act as a major contributor in resisting posterior tibial displacement: A biomechanical robotic investigation.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2025Article
- Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and additional surgeries: A review.Medicine · 2025Review
- Chinese expert consensus on failure and revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- [Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament : What must be born in mind in the reconstruction?]Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the Stability, Revision Rate, and Complication Profile of Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Lateral Extra-Articular Tenodesis and Hughston Procedure in Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Medial Collateral Ligament Injury: An 8-Year Cohort Study.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAnterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is a complication that may require revision ACL reconstruction (ACL-R). Non-anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel is thought to be a frequent cause of graft failure; however, there is a lack of evidence to support this belief. The purpose of this study was to determine if non-anatomic femoral tunnel placement is associated with increased risk of revision ACL-R.
methodsAfter screening all 315 consecutive patients who underwent primary single-bundle ACL-R by a single senior orthopedic surgeon between January 2012 and January 2017, 58 patients were found to have both strict lateral radiographs and a minimum of 24 months follow-up without revision. From a group of 456 consecutive revision ACL-R, patients were screened for strictly lateral radiographs and 59 patients were included in the revision group. Femoral tunnel placement for each patient was determined using a strict lateral radiograph taken after the primary ACL-R using the quadrant method. The center of the femoral tunnel was measured in both the posterior-anterior (PA) and proximal-distal (PD) dimensions and represented as a percentage of the total distance (normal center of anatomic footprint: PA 25% and PD 29%).
resultsIn the PA dimension, the revision group had significantly more anterior femoral tunnel placement compared with the primary group (38% ± 11% vs. 28% ± 6%, p < 0.01). Among patients who underwent revision; those with non-traumatic chronic failure had statistically significant more anterior femoral tunnel placement than those who experienced traumatic failure (41% ± 13% vs. 35% ± 8%, p < 0.03). In the PD dimension, the revision group had significantly more proximal femoral tunnel placement compared with the primary group (30% ± 9% vs 38% ± 9%, p < 0.01).
conclusionIn this retrospective study of 58 patients with successful primary ACL-R compared with 59 patients with failed ACL-R, anterior and proximal (high) femoral tunnels for ACL-R were shown to be independent risk factors for ACL revision surgery. As revision ACL-R is associated with patient- and economic burden, particular attention should be given to achieving an individualized, anatomic primary ACL-R. Surgeons may reduce the risk of revision ACL-R by placing the center of the femoral tunnel within the anatomic ACL footprint. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.