Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983452›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2021

Cryptic introgressions contribute to transgressive segregation for early blight resistance in tomato.

T A Anderson, S M Zitter, D M De Jong, D M Francis, M A Mutschler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T A AndersonPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5600-2369
S M ZitterPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
D M De JongPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA.
D M FrancisDepartment of Horticulture and Crop Science, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH, 44691, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2016-1357
M A MutschlerPlant Breeding and Genetics Section, School of Integrative Plant Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, 14853, USA. mam13@cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USThe Ohio State University · US

Funding

National Institute of Food and Agriculture 2019-67011-29557Northeast SARE 2016-38640-25380
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageWe identified cryptic early blight resistance introgressions in tomato breeding lines and demonstrated efficient genotypic selection for resistance in the context of a tomato breeding program. Early blight is a widespread and problematic disease affecting tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum). Caused by the fungal pathogen Alternaria linariae (syn. A. tomatophila), symptoms include lesions on tomato stems, fruit, and foliage, often resulting in yield losses. Breeding tomatoes with genetic resistance would enhance production sustainability. Using cross-market breeding populations, we identified several quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with early blight resistance. Early blight resistance putatively derived from 'Campbell 1943' was confirmed in modern fresh market tomato breeding lines. This resistance offered substantial protection against early blight stem lesions (collar rot) and moderate protection from defoliation. A distinctive and potentially novel form of early blight foliar resistance was discovered in a processing tomato breeding line and is probably derived from S. pimpinellifolium via 'Hawaii 7998'. Additional field trials validated the three most promising large-effect QTL, EB-1.2, EB-5, and EB-9. Resistance effects for EB-5 and EB-9 were consistent across breeding populations and environments, while EB-1.2's effect was population specific. Using genome-wide marker-assisted backcrossing, we developed fresh market tomato lines that were near-isogenic for early blight QTL. Resistance in these lines was largely mediated by just two QTL, EB-5 and EB-9, that together captured 49.0 and 68.7% of the defoliation and stem lesion variance, respectively. Our work showcases the value of mining cryptic introgressions in tomato lines, and across market classes, for use as additional sources of disease resistance.

Indexed as

Chromosome SegregationAscomycotaChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantDisease ResistancePlant DiseasesQuantitative Trait LociSolanum lycopersicum

Identifiers

PMID33983452
OpenAlexW3163087181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.