Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983440›Full record

ArticleSystematic biology2022

A Comprehensive Phylogenomic Platform for Exploring the Angiosperm Tree of Life.

William J Baker, Paul Bailey, Vanessa Barber, Abigail Barker, Sidonie Bellot, David Bishop, Laura R Botigué, Grace Brewer, Tom Carruthers, James J Clarkson and 21 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 107 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
107citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

107 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Applying Target Capture Sequencing to Unravel thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

47 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

31 authors.

William J BakerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Paul BaileyRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Vanessa BarberRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Abigail BarkerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Sidonie BellotRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
David BishopRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Laura R BotiguéRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Grace BrewerRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Tom CarruthersRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
James J ClarksonRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Jeffrey CookRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Robyn S CowanRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Steven DodsworthRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Niroshini EpitawalageRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Elaine FrançosoRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Berta GallegoRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Matthew G JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Jan T KimRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Kevin LeempoelRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Olivier MaurinRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Catherine McginnieRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Lisa PokornyRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Shyamali RoyRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Malcolm StoneRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Eduardo ToledoRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Norman J WickettPlant Science and Conservation, Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road, Glencoe, IL 60022, USA.
Alexandre R ZuntiniRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Wolf L EiserhardtRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Paul J KerseyRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Ilia J LeitchRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.
Félix ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tree of life is the fundamental biological roadmap for navigating the evolution and properties of life on Earth, and yet remains largely unknown. Even angiosperms (flowering plants) are fraught with data gaps, despite their critical role in sustaining terrestrial life. Today, high-throughput sequencing promises to significantly deepen our understanding of evolutionary relationships. Here, we describe a comprehensive phylogenomic platform for exploring the angiosperm tree of life, comprising a set of open tools and data based on the 353 nuclear genes targeted by the universal Angiosperms353 sequence capture probes. The primary goals of this article are to (i) document our methods, (ii) describe our first data release, and (iii) present a novel open data portal, the Kew Tree of Life Explorer (https://treeoflife.kew.org). We aim to generate novel target sequence capture data for all genera of flowering plants, exploiting natural history collections such as herbarium specimens, and augment it with mined public data. Our first data release, described here, is the most extensive nuclear phylogenomic data set for angiosperms to date, comprising 3099 samples validated by DNA barcode and phylogenetic tests, representing all 64 orders, 404 families (96$\%$) and 2333 genera (17$\%$). A "first pass" angiosperm tree of life was inferred from the data, which totaled 824,878 sequences, 489,086,049 base pairs, and 532,260 alignment columns, for interactive presentation in the Kew Tree of Life Explorer. This species tree was generated using methods that were rigorous, yet tractable at our scale of operation. Despite limitations pertaining to taxon and gene sampling, gene recovery, models of sequence evolution and paralogy, the tree strongly supports existing taxonomy, while challenging numerous hypothesized relationships among orders and placing many genera for the first time. The validated data set, species tree and all intermediates are openly accessible via the Kew Tree of Life Explorer and will be updated as further data become available. This major milestone toward a complete tree of life for all flowering plant species opens doors to a highly integrated future for angiosperm phylogenomics through the systematic sequencing of standardized nuclear markers. Our approach has the potential to serve as a much-needed bridge between the growing movement to sequence the genomes of all life on Earth and the vast phylogenomic potential of the world's natural history collections. [Angiosperms; Angiosperms353; genomics; herbariomics; museomics; nuclear phylogenomics; open access; target sequence capture; tree of life.].

Indexed as

MagnoliopsidaGenomicsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID33983440
PMCPMC8830076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.