Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983435›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2021

A streamlined workflow for conversion, peer review, and publication of genomics metadata as omics data papers.

Mariya Dimitrova, Raïssa Meyer, Pier Luigi Buttigieg, Teodor Georgiev, Georgi Zhelezov, Seyhan Demirov, Vincent Smith, Lyubomir Penev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Importance of timely metadata curation to the global surveillance of genetic diversity.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mariya DimitrovaPensoft Publishers, Prof. Georgi Zlatarski Street 12, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-8083-6048
Raïssa MeyerAlfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2996-719X
Pier Luigi ButtigiegAlfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Am Handelshafen 12, 27570 Bremerhaven, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4366-3088
Teodor GeorgievPensoft Publishers, Prof. Georgi Zlatarski Street 12, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-8558-6845
Georgi ZhelezovPensoft Publishers, Prof. Georgi Zlatarski Street 12, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Seyhan Demirov
Vincent SmithThe Natural History Museum, Cromwell Rd, South Kensington, SW7 5BD London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5297-7452
Lyubomir PenevPensoft Publishers, Prof. Georgi Zlatarski Street 12, 1700 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-2186-5233

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData papers have emerged as a powerful instrument for open data publishing, obtaining credit, and establishing priority for datasets generated in scientific experiments. Academic publishing improves data and metadata quality through peer review and increases the impact of datasets by enhancing their visibility, accessibility, and reusability.

objectiveWe aimed to establish a new type of article structure and template for omics studies: the omics data paper. To improve data interoperability and further incentivize researchers to publish well-described datasets, we created a prototype workflow for streamlined import of genomics metadata from the European Nucleotide Archive directly into a data paper manuscript.

methodsAn omics data paper template was designed by defining key article sections that encourage the description of omics datasets and methodologies. A metadata import workflow, based on REpresentational State Transfer services and Xpath, was prototyped to extract information from the European Nucleotide Archive, ArrayExpress, and BioSamples databases.

findingsThe template and workflow for automatic import of standard-compliant metadata into an omics data paper manuscript provide a mechanism for enhancing existing metadata through publishing.

conclusionThe omics data paper structure and workflow for import of genomics metadata will help to bring genomic and other omics datasets into the spotlight. Promoting enhanced metadata descriptions and enforcing manuscript peer review and data auditing of the underlying datasets brings additional quality to datasets. We hope that streamlined metadata reuse for scholarly publishing encourages authors to create enhanced metadata descriptions in the form of data papers to improve both the quality of their metadata and its findability and accessibility.

Indexed as

GenomicsMetadataDatabases, FactualPeer ReviewWorkflowdatadata paperFAIR principlesgenomicsmetadataMINSEQEMIxSomicsstandardsworkflow

Identifiers

PMID33983435
PMCPMC8117446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.