ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Capturing dynamic relevance in Boolean networks using graph theoretical measures.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Robust signalling entropy estimation for biological process characterisation.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- GatekeepR: an R Shiny application for the identification of nodes with high dynamic impact in Boolean networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- On the feasibility of dynamical analysis of network models of biochemical regulation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- Identification of dynamic driver sets controlling phenotypical landscapes.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
motivationInteraction graphs are able to describe regulatory dependencies between compounds without capturing dynamics. In contrast, mathematical models that are based on interaction graphs allow to investigate the dynamics of biological systems. However, since dynamic complexity of these models grows exponentially with their size, exhaustive analyses of the dynamics and consequently screening all possible interventions eventually becomes infeasible. Thus, we designed an approach to identify dynamically relevant compounds based on the static network topology.
resultsHere, we present a method only based on static properties to identify dynamically influencing nodes. Coupling vertex betweenness and determinative power, we could capture relevant nodes for changing dynamics with an accuracy of 75% in a set of 35 published logical models. Further analyses of the selected compounds' connectivity unravelled a new class of not highly connected nodes with high impact on the networks' dynamics, which we call gatekeepers. We validated our method's working concept on logical models, which can be readily scaled up to complex interaction networks, where dynamic analyses are not even feasible. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code is freely available at https://github.com/sysbio-bioinf/BNStatic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.