Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33983399›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Led Penicillin Allergy Assessment Program and Allergy Delabeling in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Nicholas A Turner, Rebekah Wrenn, Christina Sarubbi, Renee Kleris, Patricia L Lugar, Christine Radojicic, Rebekah W Moehring, Deverick J Anderson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Penicillin allergy delabeling in long-term care facilities: if not now, then when?Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. A call to address penicillin allergy labels in patients with hematopoietic stem cell transplants: How to avoid rash decisions.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2024
    Review
  11. How to Define and Manage Low-Risk Drug Allergy Labels.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Penicillin allergy delabeling: Opportunities for implementation and dissemination.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas A TurnerDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Rebekah WrennDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Christina SarubbiUniversity of North Carolina, Rex Healthcare, Raleigh.
Renee KlerisDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Patricia L LugarDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Christine RadojicicDivision of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Rebekah W MoehringDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Deverick J AndersonDivision of Infectious Diseases, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Duke University Hospital · USDuke Medical Center · USDuke University · USRex Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Penicillin allergies are frequently mislabeled, which may contribute to use of less-preferred alternative antibiotics. Objective: To evaluate a pharmacist-led allergy assessment program's association with antimicrobial use and clinical outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: A pharmacist-led allergy assessment program was launched in 2 phases (June 1, 2015, and November 2, 2016) at a single-center tertiary referral hospital. The longitudinal cross-sectional study included all study period adult admissions; hospitalwide outcomes were assessed by segmented regression. Individual outcomes were assessed within an embedded propensity score-matched case-control study of inpatients undergoing comprehensive allergy assessment following self-report of penicillin allergy. Analysis occurred from March 1, 2020, to February 29, 2020. Exposures: The longitudinal study analyzed hospital-level outcomes over 3 periods: preintervention (15 months), phase 1 (structured allergy history alone, 16 months), and phase 2 (comprehensive assessment including penicillin skin testing, 52 months). The case-control study defined cases as individuals undergoing comprehensive allergy assessment. Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospital-level outcomes included antibiotic days of therapy per 1000 patient-days and hospital-acquired Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) incidence per 10 000 patient-days. Individual outcomes included antibiotic selection, overall survival, and CDI-free survival. Results: Longitudinal analysis spanned 2014-2020 (median admissions, 46 416 per year; interquartile range [IQR], 46 001-50 091 per year). Hospitalwide, allergy histories were temporally associated with decreased use of nonpenicillin alternative antibiotics (rate ratio, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.97) and high-CDI-risk antibiotics (rate ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85-0.98). Penicillin skin testing was temporally associated with lower hospital-acquired CDI rates (rate ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.43-0.86). The embedded case-control study included 272 cases and 819 controls. Median age was 63 years (interquartile range, 51-73 years), 553 (50.7%) patients were women, and 229 (21.0%) patients were Black. Allergy-assessed patients were less likely to receive high-CDI-risk antibiotics at discharge (odds ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-0.98). Estimated reductions in mortality (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.55-1.07) and hospital-acquired CDI risk (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.18-1.55) were not statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance: Pharmacist-led allergy assessments may be associated with reduced high-CDI-risk antibiotic use at both hospitalwide and individual levels. Although individual reductions in mortality and CDI risk did not achieve significance, divergence of survival curves suggest longer-term benefits of allergy delabeling warrant future study.

Indexed as

PharmacistsTertiary Care CentersAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsCase-Control StudiesClostridium InfectionsCross InfectionCross-Sectional StudiesDrug HypersensitivityFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedPenicillinsProfessional RoleAnti-Bacterial AgentsPenicillins

Identifiers

PMID33983399
PMCPMC8120333
OpenAlexW3161505026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.