ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Individualized Fraction Regimen of SBRT Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Based on Uncomplicated and Cancer-Free Control Probability.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) currently adopts non-discriminative prescription regimen. This study attempts to investigate an individualized fraction regimen (IFR) method for SBRT patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on Uncomplicated and Cancer-free Control Probability (UCFCP).
methodsTwenty patients with NSCLC were retrospectively prescribed with 40 regimens, ranging from 8Gy×5f to 12Gy×5f in step of 0.1 Gy. Taking into consideration of the age and the BMI index of each patient as well, the tumor control probability (TCP), the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the total lung, chest wall and rib, and the secondary cancer probability (SCP) of the total lung were calculated for each plan of the patients. For the 40 regimens, the UCFCP was calculated and the maximum value of UCFCP was the IFR of the specified patient. Besides, IFR of UCP approach which only took account of the TCP and NTCP was also derived and to be compared with the IFR based on the UCFCP method.
resultsFor all the patients, the UCFCP value showed a bell-shaped trend with the change of prescription dose. Among the 20 patients, the IFRs of 16 patients were different from the original fixed regimen. Of the 16 patients, the IFR of 5 patients exhibited slight changes between UCP and UCFCP methods.
conclusionThe method based on the maximum value of UCFCP function may be helpful to provide IFR for specific SBRT patients with NSCLC, differentiating the patient specific characteristics such as anatomical structures and locations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.