Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33982280›Full record

Trial reportEpilepsia2021

Supporting treatment adherence regimens in children with epilepsy: A randomized clinical trial.

Avani C Modi, Shanna M Guilfoyle, Tracy A Glauser, Constance A Mara

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epilepsia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Health disparities in neurology.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Avani C ModiCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7580-3751
Shanna M GuilfoyleCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Tracy A GlauserCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Constance A MaraCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Supporting Treatment Adherence Regimens in Pediatric Epilepsy: The STAR TrialR01HD073115 · NICHD · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MODI, AVANI C · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study was undertaken to examine the efficacy of a family-tailored education and problem-solving behavioral intervention, Supporting Treatment Adherence Regimens (STAR), in young children (2-12 years old) with new onset epilepsy compared to an attention control (i.e., education only [EO]) intervention. Participants randomized to the STAR intervention were hypothesized to demonstrate significantly improved adherence at postintervention and 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits compared to the EO intervention. Seizure and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes were also examined.

methodsTwo hundred children with new onset epilepsy and their caregivers were recruited during routine epilepsy clinic visits. Baseline questionnaires were completed, and electronic adherence monitors were provided. Participants with adherence less than 95% during the run-in period were randomized to either STAR or EO intervention. Active intervention was provided to both groups for 4 months. Questionnaires were completed at conclusion of the active intervention phase and three follow-up time points (3, 6, and 12 months). Group differences in adherence, seizure outcomes, and HRQOL were examined using regression-based analyses of covariance and longitudinal mixed effect linear or logistical models.

resultsAdherence at 12-month follow-up was significantly different between the STAR (mean = 82.34, SD = 21.29) and EO intervention groups (mean = 61.77, SD = 28.29), with the STAR group demonstrating 20.6% greater adherence (b = 19.11, p = .04, 95% confidence interval = 1.00-37.22, d = .83). No significant differences were found between groups in seizure and HRQOL outcomes. SIGNIFICANCE: A family-based behavioral adherence intervention demonstrated sustained adherence improvements 1 year following epilepsy diagnosis compared to an epilepsy-specific education intervention. STAR is an efficacious adherence intervention that can easily be implemented into routine epilepsy care.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAnticonvulsantsCaregiversChildChild, PreschoolEpilepsyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePatient Education as TopicQuality of LifeSeizuresSurveys and QuestionnairesAnticonvulsantsantiepileptic drugsbehavioral interventioncomplianceyouth

Identifiers

PMID33982280
PMCPMC8647767
OpenAlexW3162127091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.