ArticleEndocrine2021
Low risk for all-cause mortality among patients with lung neuroendocrine tumors co-diagnosed with pituitary adenomas.
Article in Endocrine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeLung neoplasms often co-occur with pituitary adenoma (PA). However, whether co-diagnosis of lung neuroendocrine tumors (LNETs) and PA constitute a unique entity and the impact of such co-diagnosis on patients' outcome is yet to be defined. The study objective was to compare patients' clinical characteristics with LNET to patients co-diagnosed with PA.
methodsA Retrospective, case-control study based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry database between 2000 and 2016. A total of 2947 patients with LNET, including 2913 with LNET alone ("Sporadic") and 34 patients with both LNET and PA ("LNET-PA").
resultsPA preceded LNET diagnosis in 85.3% of patients and had higher rates among LNET patients (34/2947) than with any cancer (p < 0.00001) and compared to patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (15/2378, p = 0.047). LNET-PA patients were younger at diagnosis compared with NSCLC patients and PA (p = 0.04). Among patients <60 years with LNET, co-diagnosis with PA was associated with lower all-cause mortality (ACM) risk (Log-rank test, p = 0.03). Adjusted ACM risk of patients with LNET-PA was lower than sporadic LNET (hazard ratio 0.553, 95% confidence interval 0.309-0.99, p = 0.046), especially among Caucasians, and lower overall-mortality risk in patients <60 years with borderline statistical significance (p = 0.071).
conclusionsPatients with both LNET and PA constitute a distinct morbidity and mortality profile than sporadic LNET, possibly suggesting an undefined MEN syndrome. Additional studies to further investigate patients' natural course and genetic profile with these neoplasms are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.