Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33982221›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of dyslexia2021

Orthographic depth and developmental dyslexia: a meta-analytic study.

Desiré Carioti, Marta Franca Masia, Simona Travellini, Manuela Berlingeri

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of dyslexia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cognitive-Linguistic Profiles of German Adults with Dyslexia.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sex Differences in Low-Level Multisensory Integration in Developmental Dyslexia.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. What predicts word reading in Arabic?Frontiers in psychology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Desiré CariotiDISTUM, Department of Humanities, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy.
Marta Franca MasiaDISTUM, Department of Humanities, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy.
Simona TravelliniDISTUM, Department of Humanities, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy.
Manuela BerlingeriDISTUM, Department of Humanities, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy. manuela.berlingeri@uniurb.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3159-2809
University of Urbino · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cross-cultural studies have suggested that reading deficits in developmental dyslexia (DD) can be moderated by orthographic depth. To further explore this issue and assess the moderating role of orthographic depth in the developmental cognitive trajectories of dyslexic and typical readers, we systematically reviewed 113 studies on DD that were published from 2013 to 2018 and selected 79 in which participants received an official DD diagnosis. Each study was classified according to orthographic depth (deep vs. shallow) and participant age (children vs. adults). We assessed the difference between DD and control groups' performance in reading tasks and in a wide range of cognitive domains associated with reading (phonological awareness (PA), rapid automatized naming (RAN), short-term working memory (WM), and nonverbal reasoning), including age and orthographies as moderators. We found an age-by-orthography interaction effect in word reading accuracy and a significant effect of age in pseudoword reading accuracy, but we found no effect of age and orthographic depth on the fluency parameters. These results suggest that reading speed is a reliable index for discriminating between DD and control groups across European orthographies from childhood to adulthood. A similar pattern of results emerged for PA, RAN, and short-term/WM. Our findings are discussed in relation to their impact on clinical practice while considering the orthographic depth and developmental level.

Indexed as

DyslexiaAdolescentAdultAwarenessChildHumansMemory, Short-TermPhoneticsReadingYoung AdultDevelopmental dyslexiaOrthographic depthPhonological awarenessRANReading skillsWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID33982221
PMCPMC8458191
OpenAlexW3161556327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.