Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33982157›Full record

Observational studyAesthetic plastic surgery2021

One-Stage Mastopexy-Lipofilling in Cosmetic Breast Surgery: A Prospective Study.

Maria Lucia Mangialardi, Camille Ozil, Cristophe Lepage

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. J-Scar Mammaplasty: A Personal Approach.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Maria Lucia MangialardiHôpital américain de Paris, 63, boulevard Victor-Hugo, 92200, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France. marialucia.mangialardi@hotmail.it.ORCID 0000-0002-4826-887X
Camille OzilHôpital américain de Paris, 63, boulevard Victor-Hugo, 92200, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Cristophe LepageHôpital américain de Paris, 63, boulevard Victor-Hugo, 92200, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France.
Hôpital américain de paris · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMastopexy in combination with implant breast augmentation still remains a controversial topic in plastic surgery because of its complexity and its relative high rate of complications. To obviate the need of a breast implant, numerous authors described glandular rearrangement techniques to optimize upper pole fullness and breast projection. More recently, the combination of mastopexy and lipofilling has been described. The aim of this study is to report our experience on one-stage mastopexy-lipofilling in cosmetic breast surgery, describing our surgical technique and focusing on long-term esthetic results and patient-reported outcomes. MATERIAL AND

methodA prospective observational study was performed including all patients underwent cosmetic one-stage mastopexy-lipofilling. Collected data included patient's age and BMI, smoking, preoperative and postoperative cup size and grade of ptosis, preoperative and postoperative distances between the upper part of the nipple areola complex and the inframammary fold and between the upper part of the nipple areola complex and the sternal notch, mean liposuction and fat injection volume, mean operating time and postoperative complications. Cosmetic results and patient satisfaction were evaluated using the 5 points Likert scale considering breast volume, shape, symmetry, quality of scars, nipple areola complex and donor site shape and global satisfaction.

resultsA total of 21 patients (42 breasts) were included with a mean follow-up of 13.8 months. Mean liposuction and injection volumes were 1070 mL and 230 mL, respectively. With respect to breast size, 11 patients (52.4%) showed an increase in one-cup size, while 10 patients (47.6%) showed a slight increase in volume without changing cup size. The mean NAC-SN and NAC-IMF distances decreased by an average of 3.7 cm and 1.7 cm, respectively. Regarding esthetic outcomes, the mean scores for breast volume, shape, symmetry, quality of scars, nipple areola complex and donor site shape were 4.1, 4.2, 4.9, 4, 4.6 and 5, respectively. With respect to patient satisfaction, mean scores for breast volume, shape, symmetry, quality of scars, nipple areola complex and donor site shape were 4.2, 5, 5, 4.7, 5 and 5, respectively. The achievement of a satisfactory outcome (> 4) was obtained in all patients but 1 with a mean score of 4.5 (3-5).

conclusionThe current study suggests that one-stage mastopexy-lipofilling is a safe technique, which leads with satisfactory outcomes allowing breast contouring and breast volume increase. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastySurgery, PlasticEstheticsFemaleHumansNipplesProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSurgical FlapsTreatment OutcomeBreast augmentationLipofillingMastopexy

Identifiers

PMID33982157
OpenAlexW3160925631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.