Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33981910›Full record

ArticleCurrent opinion in electrochemistry2019

On the intersection of electrochemistry and mass spectrometry.

Lane A Baker, Gargi S Jagdale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current opinion in electrochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lane A BakerIndiana University, Department of Chemistry, 800 E. Kirkwood Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Gargi S JagdaleIndiana University, Department of Chemistry, 800 E. Kirkwood Avenue, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.

Funding

From single molecule to microfluidic 3D tissue platforms: novel multiscale tools to investigate hyper-stimulated immune cells in the circulationR01NS105888 · NINDS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Lane A. Baker, ROBERT Scott MARTIN · 2018 to 2026
$4.0M
Bio/Chemical Mapping of Pancreatic Cell ActivityR21EB022297 · NIBIB · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI BAKER, LANE A. · 2016 to 2017
$407k
NIBIB NIH HHS R21 EB022297NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The application of nanopipettes, developed first as a tool for electrochemistry and electrophysiology, as tools for mass spectrometry is considered. Recent examples of advances in electrospray ionization and sampling for mass spectrometry with nanopipettes is discussed. These examples show a scientific intersection that is ripe for further development.

Indexed as

ImagingIonizationMass spectrometryMicrofluidicsNanofluidicsSampling

Identifiers

PMID33981910
PMCPMC8112614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.