Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33981858›Full record

ReviewBMJ open ophthalmology2021

Prevalence of keratoconus in persons with Down syndrome: a review.

Olav Kristianslund, Liv Drolsum

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Systemic and Ocular Associations of Keratoconus.Expert review of ophthalmology · 2024
    Article
  10. Systemic Associations with Keratoconus.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. The Ophthalmic Manifestations of Down Syndrome.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. The Underlying Relationship between Keratoconus and Down Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Techniques in pediatric refractive surgery.Saudi journal of ophthalmology : official journal of the Saudi Ophthalmological Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Olav KristianslundDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3390-9811
Liv DrolsumDepartment of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeKeratoconus is a vision-threatening condition, and there is a need for knowledge about the occurrence in subgroups of the population. The progression of the disease can be effectively stopped, and vision may be restored, if keratoconus is diagnosed at an early stage. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature of the prevalence of keratoconus in persons with Down syndrome.

methodsWe conducted a literature review of keratoconus prevalence in persons with Down syndrome. A thorough search was performed in Pubmed (Medline), and the quality of evidence was evaluated.

resultsThe literature review identified 20 relevant studies, which reported keratoconus in 0%-71% of persons with Down syndrome. These studies varied greatly in design, patient selection, sample sizes and mean age, and the quality of evidence concerning estimates for the prevalence of keratoconus was generally evaluated as low. Most studies that included adults reported high prevalences of keratoconus-in many studies more than 10-fold the prevalence in the general population. No large screening studies in persons with Down syndrome were identified.

conclusionsThe present review showed that the prevalence of keratoconus in persons with Down syndrome is higher than in the general population. However, estimates from previous studies vary widely. Screening for keratoconus in this group should be considered.

Indexed as

corneaepidemiologygenetics

Identifiers

PMID33981858
PMCPMC8061858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.