Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33981780›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy. Methods & clinical development2021

CRISPAltRations: a validated cloud-based approach for interrogation of double-strand break repair mediated by CRISPR genome editing.

Gavin Kurgan, Rolf Turk, Heng Li, Nathan Roberts, Garrett R Rettig, Ashley M Jacobi, Lauren Tso, Morgan Sturgeon, Massimo Mertens, Roel Noten and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A precision gene-engineered B cell medicine producing sustained levels of active factor IX for hemophilia B therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparative analysis of CRISPR off-target discovery tools following ex vivo editing of CD34Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Gavin KurganIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Rolf TurkIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Heng LiDepartment of Data Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02215.
Nathan RobertsIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Garrett R RettigIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Ashley M JacobiIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Lauren TsoIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Morgan SturgeonIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Massimo MertensIllumina, Inc., San Diego, CA 92122.
Roel NotenIllumina, Inc., San Diego, CA 92122.
Kurt FlorusIllumina, Inc., San Diego, CA 92122.
Mark A BehlkeIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Yu WangIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.
Matthew S McNeillIntegrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA 52241, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR systems enable targeted genome editing in a wide variety of organisms by introducing single- or double-strand DNA breaks, which are repaired using endogenous molecular pathways. Characterization of on- and off-target editing events from CRISPR proteins can be evaluated using targeted genome resequencing. We characterized DNA repair fingerprints that result from non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) after double-stranded breaks (DSBs) were introduced by Cas9 or Cas12a for >500 paired treatment/control experiments. We found that building biological understanding of the repair into a novel analysis tool (CRISPAltRations) improved the quality of the results. We validated our software using simulated, targeted amplicon sequencing data (11 guide RNAs [gRNAs] and 603 on- and off-target locations) and demonstrated that CRISPAltRations outperforms other publicly available software tools in accurately annotating CRISPR-associated indels and homology-directed repair (HDR) events. We enable non-bioinformaticians to use CRISPAltRations by developing a web-accessible, cloud-hosted deployment, which allows rapid batch processing of samples in a graphical user interface (GUI) and complies with HIPAA security standards. By ensuring that our software is thoroughly tested, version controlled, and supported with a user interface (UI), we enable resequencing analysis of CRISPR genome editing experiments to researchers no matter their skill in bioinformatics.

Indexed as

amplicon sequencingbioinformaticsCas12aCas9CRISPRDNA repairgenome editingnext-generation sequencing softwarenon-homologous end joiningoff-target analysis

Identifiers

PMID33981780
PMCPMC8082044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.