ReviewOcular oncology and pathology2021
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Adenoma and Adenocarcinoma: A Review.
Review in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adenocarcinoma Arising from Unilateral Retinal Pigment Epithelium Dysgenesis.Journal of vitreoretinal diseases · 2026Article
- A nonpigmented retinal pigment epithelium adenoma with retinitis pigmentosa:A case report.American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2026Article
- Advances in multimodal imaging for diagnosis of pigmented ocular fundus lesions.Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie · 2024Review
- Retinal Pigment Epithelial Adenoma: Initial Treatment Outcomes following Episcleral Brachytherapy.Ocular oncology and pathology · 2024Article
- Melanoma, Melanin, and Melanogenesis: The Yin and Yang Relationship.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Nonpigmented Adenoma of the Retinal Pigment Epithelium Mimicking a Retinal Vasoproliferative Tumor Managed With Endoresection.Journal of vitreoretinal diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adenoma and adenocarcinoma of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) are rare intraocular tumours that are often misdiagnosed as posterior uveal melanoma or other simulating lesions. It is important to be able to differentiate these tumours from melanoma for 3 reasons. First, an inability to rule out melanoma often tilts the management towards enucleation. Second, management options like radiotherapy and local resection which work well for melanoma may not be easily applied to these tumours. Third, and most importantly, patients with melanoma need a lifetime follow-up to rule out metastases (metastatic dormancy) whereas RPE tumours hardly metastasize. An abruptly elevated, often deeply pigmented tumour, with a prominent retinal feeding artery and a draining vein causing exudation, should raise a suspicion of RPE tumours. RPE tumours have a remarkable local invasive potential but a low metastatic potential. Most RPE tumours require treatment due to local complications. Small, asymptomatic tumours can be generally observed. Enucleation is still the gold standard of treatment, although local resection has been reported in selected cases with good results. Here, we provide a comprehensive review of the demographic, clinical, and imaging features of true acquired neoplasms of the RPE, namely adenoma and adenocarcinoma, the ways to differentiate them from melanoma, their clinical course and prognosis, and Options for their management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.