Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33981666›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health

Mental Well-Being in UK Higher Education During Covid-19: Do Students Trust Universities and the Government?

Margaret Anne Defeyter, Paul B Stretesky, Michael A Long, Sinéad Furey, Christian Reynolds, Debbie Porteous, Alyson Dodd, Emily Mann, Anna Kemp, James Fox and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Perceived academic challenges of Jewish and Arab undergraduates during the first wave of COVID-19.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Margaret Anne DefeyterHealthy Living Lab, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Paul B StreteskyHealthy Living Lab, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Michael A LongDepartment of Sociology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.
Sinéad FureyUlster University Business School, Coleraine, United Kingdom.
Christian ReynoldsCentre for Food Policy, City University, London, United Kingdom.
Debbie PorteousHealthy Living Lab, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Alyson DoddHealthy Living Lab, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Emily MannHealthy Living Lab, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Anna KempStudent Union, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
James FoxMarketing Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Andrew McAnallenStudent Union, Ulster University, Coleraine, United Kingdom.
Lara GonçalvesDepartment of Sociology, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper draws upon the concept of recreancy to examine the mental well-being of university students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Briefly, recreancy is loss of societal trust that results when institutional actors can no longer be counted on to perform their responsibilities. Our study of mental well-being and recreancy focuses on the role of universities and government regulators within the education sector. We surveyed 600 UK students attending 161 different public higher education providers in October 2020 during a time when many UK students were isolated in their residences and engaged in online learning. We assessed student well-being using the Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (scored 7-35) and found the mean score to be 19.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.6, 20.2]. This level of well-being indicates that a significant proportion of UK students face low levels of mental well-being. Structural equation modeling (SEM) analysis indicates that high recreancy-measured as a low trust in universities and the government-is associated with low levels of mental well-being across the student sample. While these findings are suggestive, they are also important and we suggest that government and university leaders should not only work to increase food and housing security during the Covid-19 pandemic, but also consider how to combat various sector trends that might intensify recreancy.

Indexed as

COVID-19UniversitiesGovernmentHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2StudentsTrustUnited Kingdomecological disasterfood securityhousing securitylockdownrecreancy

Identifiers

PMID33981666
PMCPMC8107392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.