Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33981551›Full record

ArticleArthroscopy techniques2021

Interlocking Closed-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy Modified With Oblique Osteotomy Lines and a Locking Plate Fixation.

Ken Okazaki

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroscopy techniques, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ken OkazakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Closed-wedge high tibial osteotomy (CWHTO) is more advantageous over open-wedge high tibial osteotomy in the following viewpoints: (1) compression force from the patellar tendon to the osteotomy site contribute to its stability, (2) patellar baja less likely occurs, and (3) hardware implant is placed under the thick muscle, which could prevent risk of irritation and infection. Although conventional CWHTO resects the wedge bone, including the anterior and posterior cortices, interlocking CWHTO preserves them while performing osteotomy for the anterior or posterior cortex with only the proximal or distal osteotomy line, respectively. When the wedge is being closed, the distal fragment is internally rotated overlying the anterior and posterior cortices on the proximal and distal cortices, respectively. As a result, good rotational stability and anterior advancement of the tibial tubercle are obtained. Interlocking CWHTO can be applied for patients with moderate patellofemoral osteoarthritis. Adopting an oblique osteotomy line enables secure multiple screw fixations for a long locking plate with a good fitting, allowing early postoperative weightbearing.

Identifiers

PMID33981551
PMCPMC8085353
OpenAlexW3137693643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.