ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2021
Saccade Landing Point Prediction Based on Fine-Grained Learning Method.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A method for measuring closed-loop latency in gaze-contingent rendering without extra equipment.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- The percentile-matching technique for synthetic eye tracking signal degradation: A biometric case study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Seeing on the fly: Physiological and behavioral evidence show that space-to-space representation and processing enable fast and efficient performance by the visual system.Journal of vision · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The landing point of a saccade defines the new fixation region, the new region of interest. We asked whether it was possible to predict the saccade landing point early in this very fast eye movement. This work proposes a new algorithm based on LSTM networks and a fine-grained loss function for saccade landing point prediction in real-world scenarios. Predicting the landing point is a critical milestone toward reducing the problems caused by display-update latency in gaze-contingent systems that make real-time changes in the display based on eye tracking. Saccadic eye movements are some of the fastest human neuro-motor activities with angular velocities of up to 1,000°/s. We present a comprehensive analysis of the performance of our method using a database with almost 220,000 saccades from 75 participants captured during natural viewing of videos. We include a comparison with state-of-the-art saccade landing point prediction algorithms. The results obtained using our proposed method outperformed existing approaches with improvements of up to 50% error reduction. Finally, we analyzed some factors that affected prediction errors including duration, length, age, and user intrinsic characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.