Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33981190›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care2021

A Qualitative Study on the Implementation of Flexible Assertive Community Treatment - an Integrated Community-based Treatment Model for Patients with Severe Mental Illness.

Camilla Munch Nielsen, Carsten Hjorthøj, Merete Nordentoft, Ulla Christensen

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Camilla Munch NielsenCopenhagen Research Center for Mental Health (CORE), Mental Health Center Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3918-5914
Carsten HjorthøjCopenhagen University Hospital & University of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6943-4785
Merete NordentoftCopenhagen University Hospital, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4895-7023
Ulla ChristensenUniversity of Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7797-6640

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFlexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) is a model of integrated care aiming to increase continuity of care for individuals with severe mental illness. FACT teams have been implemented in many countries by merging Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) and standard care from Community Mental Health teams (CMHTs). However, there has been little research on how practitioners experienced the fusion of these teams.

aimThis study explores how former ACT and CMHT practitioners perceived the implementation of FACT.

methodPerceptions of the FACT model, implementation strategies and adaptations of the model were investigated through 17 semi-structured interviews with FACT practitioners.

resultsPerceived positive contributions of FACT included the recognition that FACT addressed a service gap for a group of patients who could benefit from increased support and improved integration of outpatient and hospital care. Perceived disadvantages of FACT included the experience that FACT drew away resources from ACT patients with the highest psychiatric needs. The findings also describe barriers to implementation, such as lack of perceived benefit of FACT, the maintenance of traditional work culture and insufficient organisational capacity. These challenges required the negotiation of local implementation strategies and adaptations.

conclusionFACT increases access to intensive care for a broader group of patients with severe mental illness. However, findings from this study also suggest that the increased caseload in FACT compared with ACT and a changed mindset may not reflect the needs of the smaller group of patients who find it difficult to engage with mental health care services.

Indexed as

clinical experiencecontextimplementationintegrated caresevere mental illness

Identifiers

PMID33981190
PMCPMC8086721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.