ReviewCommunications biology2021
The oncological relevance of fragile sites in cancer.
Review in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Germline DNA Damage Repair Gene Alterations in Patients with Metachronous Breast and Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Optical genome mapping unveils hidden structural variants in neurodevelopmental disorders.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Cytidine Deaminase Resolves Replicative Stress and Protects Pancreatic Cancer from DNA-Targeting Drugs.Cancer research · 2024Article
- Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields (PEMFs) Trigger Cell Death and Senescence in Cancer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Circ_0001944 Targets the miR-1292-5p/FBLN2 Axis to Facilitate Sorafenib Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Impeding Ferroptosis.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2024Article
- Mapping the landscape of HPV integration and characterising virus and host genome interactions in HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.Clinical and translational medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- G-Quadruplex Structures Are Key Modulators of Somatic Structural Variants in Cancers.Cancer research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent developments in sequencing the cancer genome have provided the first in-depth mapping of structural variants (SV) across 38 tumour types. Sixteen signatures of structural variants have been proposed which broadly characterise the variation seen across cancer types. One signature shows increased duplications and deletions at fragile sites, with little association with the typical DNA repair defects. We discuss how, for many of these fragile sites, the clinical impacts are yet to be explored. One example is NAALADL2, one of the most frequently altered fragile sites in the cancer genome. The copy-number variations (CNVs) which occur at fragile sites, such as NAALADL2, may span many genes without typical DNA repair defects and could have a large impact on cell signalling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.