Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980976›Full record

ArticleLeukemia2021

Long-term treatment-free remission in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia after second-line nilotinib: ENESTop 5-year update.

Timothy P Hughes, Nelma Cristina D Clementino, Mikhail Fominykh, Jeffrey H Lipton, Anna G Turkina, Elena Beatriz Moiraghi, Franck E Nicolini, Naoto Takahashi, Tomasz Sacha, Dong-Wook Kim and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Leukemia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Improving the Dosing Schedules of Targeted Anticancer Agents.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Timothy P HughesSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. tim.hughes@sahmri.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-3730
Nelma Cristina D ClementinoHospital Das Clinicas Da UFMG, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Mikhail FominykhRussian Research Institute of Hematology and Transfusiology, Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6552-8023
Jeffrey H LiptonPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anna G TurkinaNational Research Center for Hematology, Moscow, Russian Federation.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9947-2371
Elena Beatriz MoiraghiHospital General De Agudos J. M. Ramos Mejia, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Franck E NicoliniHematology Department, Centre Léon Berard, Lyon, France.
Naoto TakahashiDepartment of Hematology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6758-3787
Tomasz SachaDepartment of Hematology, Jagiellonian University Hospital, Krakow, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7207-6595
Dong-Wook KimSeoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3967-4267
Rafik Fellague-ChebraNovartis Pharma SAS, Rueil-Malmaison, Paris, France.
Ranjan TiwariNovartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd, Hyderabad, India.
Catherine BouardNovartis Pharma SAS, Rueil-Malmaison, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2856-660X
Francois-Xavier MahonCancer Center of Bordeaux, Institut Bergonié, INSERM U1218, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ENESTop study evaluated treatment-free remission (TFR) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) in chronic phase who had received ≥3 years of tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and achieved sustained deep molecular response only after switching from imatinib to nilotinib. After 1-year nilotinib consolidation, 126 patients attempted TFR. At 48 weeks (primary analysis), 57.9% (73/126) were in TFR. In the present analysis at 5 years, 42.9% (54/126) were in TFR. Since the 48-week analysis, among patients who left the TFR phase, 58% (11/19) did not have a loss of molecular response and discontinued for other reasons. Of the 59 patients who reinitiated nilotinib upon loss of major molecular response (MMR) or confirmed loss of MR

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveLong-Term CareMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisProspective StudiesPyrimidinesRemission InductionSurvival RatenilotinibPyrimidines

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.