Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980971›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2021

HER2 in situ hybridization test in breast cancer: quantifying margins of error and genetic heterogeneity.

António Polónia, Ana Caramelo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Image analysis for bright-field HER2 in situ hybridization: validation for clinical use.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computer-aided scoring ofJournal of pathology informatics · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

António PolóniaDepartment of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal. antoniopolonia@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0001-8312-1681
Ana CarameloDepartment of Pathology, Ipatimup Diagnostics, Institute of Molecular Pathology and Immunology, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of counting increasing number of invasive cancer cells in the result of the HER2 in situ hybridization (ISH) test in breast cancer as well as to compare two different approaches of measuring genomic heterogeneity (single cell and population based). A cohort of 100 consecutive breast cancer cases (primary and metastatic) were evaluated for HER2 gene amplification with bright-field ISH. The evaluation of the samples included scoring 20 nuclei, in five different areas, measuring the margins of error for each case. Genomic heterogeneity (GH) was defined by the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline as a discrete population of tumor cells with HER2 amplification. We also evaluated GH as single tumor cells with HER2 amplification. The stabilization of the coefficient of variation of HER2/CEP17 ratio requires about 60 invasive cancer cells. The average margin of error of HER2/CEP17 ratio and of HER2 copy number was 0.40 and 0.53, respectively, when counting 20 cells, decreasing to 0.20 and 0.26 when counting 100 cells. Population GH was observed in 1% of the cases, while single cell GH was observed in 27% of the cases, reaching its maximum value in cases near the thresholds of positivity. Therefore, margins of error in HER2 ISH test are high, and the minimal cell number recommended in current guidelines should be raised to at least 60 cells. Population GH is a rare event and single cell GH is maximal in cases near the thresholds.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGenetic HeterogeneityHumansIn Situ HybridizationMiddle AgedBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.