Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980946›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Affective empathy predicts self-isolation behaviour acceptance during coronavirus risk exposure.

Serena Petrocchi, Sheila Bernardi, Roberto Malacrida, Rafael Traber, Luca Gabutti, Nicola Grignoli

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Engagement in Behavior to Prevent COVID-19 Infection for the Sake of Oneself or Others?The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Empathy through the Pandemic: Changes of Different Emphatic Dimensions during the COVID-19 Outbreak.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Serena Petrocchi *Institute of Communication and Health, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland. serena.petrocchi@usi.ch.
Sheila BernardiSasso Corbaro Medical Humanities Foundation, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Roberto MalacridaSasso Corbaro Medical Humanities Foundation, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
Rafael TraberCantonal Sociopsychiatric Organisation, Public Health Division, Department of Health and Social Care, Repubblica e Cantone Ticino, Mendrisio, Switzerland.
Luca GabuttiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Regional Hospital of Bellinzona and Valleys, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona and Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland.
Nicola Grignoli *Cantonal Sociopsychiatric Organisation, Public Health Division, Department of Health and Social Care, Repubblica e Cantone Ticino, Mendrisio, Switzerland. nicola.grignoli@ti.ch.
Repubblica e Cantone Ticino · CHEnte Ospedaliero Cantonale · CHUniversità della Svizzera italiana · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health risk exposure during the global COVID-19 pandemic has required people to adopt self-isolation. Public authorities have therefore had the difficult task of sustaining such protective but stressful behaviour. Evidence shows that besides egoistic drives, the motivation for self-isolation behaviour could be altruistic. However, the type and role of prosocial motivation in the current pandemic is underestimated and its interaction with risk exposure and psychological distress is largely unknown. Here we show that affective empathy for the most vulnerable predicts acceptance of lockdown measures. In two retrospective studies, one with a general population and one with COVID-19 positive patients, we found that (1) along with health risk exposure, affective empathy is a predictor of acceptance of lockdown measures (2) social covariates and psychological distress have no significant impact. Our results support the need to focus on altruistic behaviours while informing the public instead of on fear-inducing messages.

Indexed as

BehaviorAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAltruismCOVID-19EmpathyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationPandemicsPhysical DistancingPsychological DistressRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID33980946
PMCPMC8115029
OpenAlexW3161048579

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.