ArticleScientific reports2021
Random forest-based prediction of stroke outcome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Predictive Value of Machine Learning for Poststroke Mortality Risk: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Can Artificial Intelligence Be Applied to Diagnose Intracerebral Hemorrhage under the Background of the Fourth Industrial Revolution? A Novel Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Pooled it
- Machine learning-based prediction of 3-6-month post-stroke cognitive impairment using acute-phase clinical data: a two-center retrospective prognostic modeling study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting NICU admission in preterm infants: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Translational pediatrics · 2026Article
- Integrative Multidimensional Machine Learning Models for Stroke Prognosis: Age-Stratified and History Engineered Perspectives.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A clinical machine learning model for 1-year functional outcome prediction in acute ischemic stroke: temporal validation across evolving guidelines.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Association between the oxidative balance score and depressive symptoms in adults with metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study from NHANES.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Assessing performance, calibration, and explainability of machine learning versus traditional models for early outcome prediction after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.Systematic reviews · 2026Article
- An explainable artificial intelligence framework for clinical decision support in stroke discharge planning.PloS one · 2026Article
- Machine Learning Analysis of Risk Factors for Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections in Stroke Patients and Their Impact on Healthcare Quality.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- A transcriptomic signature that predicts prehypertension in adolescence and higher systolic blood pressure in childhood.JCI insight · 2025Article
- Identifying patterns of high intraoperative blood pressure variability in noncardiac surgery using explainable machine learning: a retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- A computed tomography-based radiomics prediction model for BRAF mutation status in colorectal cancer.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Automated deep U-Net model for ischemic stroke lesion segmentation in the sub-acute phase.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine learning applications in forecasting patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes after carpal tunnel release: a retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- A Novel Cooperative AI-Based Fall Risk Prediction Model for Older Adults.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- optRF: Optimising random forest stability by determining the optimal number of trees.BMC bioinformatics · 2025Article
- An Integrative Machine Learning Model for Predicting Early Safety Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in stroke risk assessment and management via retinal imaging.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We research into the clinical, biochemical and neuroimaging factors associated with the outcome of stroke patients to generate a predictive model using machine learning techniques for prediction of mortality and morbidity 3-months after admission. The dataset consisted of patients with ischemic stroke (IS) and non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) admitted to Stroke Unit of a European Tertiary Hospital prospectively registered. We identified the main variables for machine learning Random Forest (RF), generating a predictive model that can estimate patient mortality/morbidity according to the following groups: (1) IS + ICH, (2) IS, and (3) ICH. A total of 6022 patients were included: 4922 (mean age 71.9 ± 13.8 years) with IS and 1100 (mean age 73.3 ± 13.1 years) with ICH. NIHSS at 24, 48 h and axillary temperature at admission were the most important variables to consider for evolution of patients at 3-months. IS + ICH group was the most stable for mortality prediction [0.904 ± 0.025 of area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC)]. IS group presented similar results, although variability between experiments was slightly higher (0.909 ± 0.032 of AUC). ICH group was the one in which RF had more problems to make adequate predictions (0.9837 vs. 0.7104 of AUC). There were no major differences between IS and IS + ICH groups according to morbidity prediction (0.738 and 0.755 of AUC) but, after checking normality with a Shapiro Wilk test with the null hypothesis that the data follow a normal distribution, it was rejected with W = 0.93546 (p-value < 2.2e-16). Conditions required for a parametric test do not hold, and we performed a paired Wilcoxon Test assuming the null hypothesis that all the groups have the same performance. The null hypothesis was rejected with a value < 2.2e-16, so there are statistical differences between IS and ICH groups. In conclusion, machine learning algorithms RF can be effectively used in stroke patients for long-term outcome prediction of mortality and morbidity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.