Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980905›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Spatial and temporal analysis of cumulative environmental effects of offshore wind farms in the North Sea basin.

Laura Florentina Gușatu, Stefano Menegon, Daniel Depellegrin, Christian Zuidema, André Faaij, Claudia Yamu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura Florentina GușatuDepartment of Planning, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, 9747 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands. l.f.gusatu@rug.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0544-9416
Stefano MenegonCNR-National Research Council of Italy, ISMAR-Institute of Marine Sciences, Castello 2737/F, 30122, Venice, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4488-8745
Daniel DepellegrinRenewable Energy Group, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Cornwall Campus, Penryn, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6493-9506
Christian ZuidemaDepartment of Planning, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, 9747 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5055-5053
André FaaijFaculty of Science and Engineering, University of Groningen, 9747 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1224-5940
Claudia YamuDepartment of Planning, Faculty of Spatial Sciences, University of Groningen, 9747 AD, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2847-4975

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The North Sea basin is one of the busiest maritime areas globally with a considerable number of anthropogenic pressures impacting the functioning of the marine ecosystem. Due to growing EU ambitions for the deployment of large offshore wind farm projects (OWF), as part of the 2050 renewable energy roadmap, there is a key need for a holistic understanding of OWF potential impacts on the marine ecosystem. We propose a holistic Cumulative Effect Assessment methodology, applied using a geo-spatial open-source software, to assess impacts of OWF related pressures on selected seabed habitats, fish, seabird and mammal species. We take into account pressures specific to the three OWF development phases, spanning 1999-2050, for the entire North Sea basin. Our results underline 2022 as the peak year of cumulative impacts for the approved OWFs, followed by a considerable increase in potential impacts of the planned 212GWs, by 2050. The spatio-temporal analysis of the OWF environmental impacts presents the shift between highly impacted areas over the studied timeline and distinguishes between concentrated areas of high impacts (S-E of UK) and dispersed areas of high impacts (Germany). Our results can inform decision-makers and the OWF industry in a joint effort to mitigate the environmental impacts of future large OWF developments.

Identifiers

PMID33980905
PMCPMC8115305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.