ReviewNPJ microgravity2021
Planetary extravehicular activity (EVA) risk mitigation strategies for long-duration space missions.
Review in NPJ microgravity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.
- Communication delay increases procedure time and instructor task load during simulated suturing by novices.NPJ microgravity · 2026Article
- A systematic review identifying fitness metrics indicative of simulated astronaut extravehicular activity task performance.NPJ microgravity · 2026Article
- The effect of spaceflight and simulated microgravity exposure on thermoregulation in humans: a systematic review.NPJ microgravity · 2026Article
- Effects of dual-axis orientation disparities and visuo-vestibular cue conflicts on perspective taking.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Space Physiology and Technology: Adaptations, Countermeasures, and Opportunities for Wearable Systems.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Review
- Design and dynamics of space- station-based one-degree-of-freedom repeatedly deployable exposure platform.iScience · 2025Article
- Congestion and Sinonasal Illness in Outer Space: A Study on the International Space Station.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
- Pose estimation and tracking dataset for multi-animal behavior analysis on the China Space Station.Scientific data · 2025Article
- The evolution of new and emerging occupational health and safety risks: A qualitative review.Work (Reading, Mass.) · 2024Review
- Evaluation of free-floating tracheal intubation in weightlessness via ice-pick position with a direct laryngoscopy and classic approach with indirect videolaryngoscopy.NPJ microgravity · 2023Article
- Updates to the NASA human system risk management process for space exploration.NPJ microgravity · 2023Review
- Adding Sound Transparency to a Spacesuit: Effect on Cognitive Performance in Females.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Growth Behavior and Transcriptome Profile Analysis ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2022Article
- Wide Range Applications of Spirulina: From Earth to Space Missions.Marine drugs · 2022Review
- Understanding the Complexities and Changes of the Astronaut Microbiome for Successful Long-Duration Space Missions.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Extravehicular activity (EVA) is one of the most dangerous activities of human space exploration. To ensure astronaut safety and mission success, it is imperative to identify and mitigate the inherent risks and challenges associated with EVAs. As we continue to explore beyond low earth orbit and embark on missions back to the Moon and onward to Mars, it becomes critical to reassess EVA risks in the context of a planetary surface, rather than in microgravity. This review addresses the primary risks associated with EVAs and identifies strategies that could be implemented to mitigate those risks during planetary surface exploration. Recent findings within the context of spacesuit design, Concept of Operations (CONOPS), and lessons learned from analog research sites are summarized, and how their application could pave the way for future long-duration space missions is discussed. In this context, we divided EVA risk mitigation strategies into two main categories: (1) spacesuit design and (2) CONOPS. Spacesuit design considerations include hypercapnia prevention, thermal regulation and humidity control, nutrition, hydration, waste management, health and fitness, decompression sickness, radiation shielding, and dust mitigation. Operational strategies discussed include astronaut fatigue and psychological stressors, communication delays, and the use of augmented reality/virtual reality technologies. Although there have been significant advances in EVA performance, further research and development are still warranted to enable safer and more efficient surface exploration activities in the upcoming future.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.