Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980866›Full record

ReviewNPJ microgravity2021

Planetary extravehicular activity (EVA) risk mitigation strategies for long-duration space missions.

Blaze Belobrajdic, Kate Melone, Ana Diaz-Artiles

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ microgravity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
38.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Adding Sound Transparency to a Spacesuit: Effect on Cognitive Performance in Females.IEEE open journal of engineering in medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Growth Behavior and Transcriptome Profile Analysis ofPolish journal of microbiology · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Blaze BelobrajdicDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1862-5378
Kate MeloneDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2676-866X
Ana Diaz-ArtilesDepartment of Aerospace Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States. adartiles@tamu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0459-9327
Texas A&M University · US

Funding

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC19K0656National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) 80NSSC19K0969
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extravehicular activity (EVA) is one of the most dangerous activities of human space exploration. To ensure astronaut safety and mission success, it is imperative to identify and mitigate the inherent risks and challenges associated with EVAs. As we continue to explore beyond low earth orbit and embark on missions back to the Moon and onward to Mars, it becomes critical to reassess EVA risks in the context of a planetary surface, rather than in microgravity. This review addresses the primary risks associated with EVAs and identifies strategies that could be implemented to mitigate those risks during planetary surface exploration. Recent findings within the context of spacesuit design, Concept of Operations (CONOPS), and lessons learned from analog research sites are summarized, and how their application could pave the way for future long-duration space missions is discussed. In this context, we divided EVA risk mitigation strategies into two main categories: (1) spacesuit design and (2) CONOPS. Spacesuit design considerations include hypercapnia prevention, thermal regulation and humidity control, nutrition, hydration, waste management, health and fitness, decompression sickness, radiation shielding, and dust mitigation. Operational strategies discussed include astronaut fatigue and psychological stressors, communication delays, and the use of augmented reality/virtual reality technologies. Although there have been significant advances in EVA performance, further research and development are still warranted to enable safer and more efficient surface exploration activities in the upcoming future.

Identifiers

PMID33980866
PMCPMC8115028
OpenAlexW3162254808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.