Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980861›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2021

Evaluation of the association of heterozygous germline variants in NTHL1 with breast cancer predisposition: an international multi-center study of 47,180 subjects.

Na Li, Magnus Zethoven, Simone McInerny, Lisa Devereux, Yu-Kuan Huang, Niko Thio, Dane Cheasley, Sara Gutiérrez-Enríquez, Alejandro Moles-Fernández, Orland Diez and 23 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Cohort Profile: Lifepool.International journal of epidemiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. How many is too many? Polyposis syndromes and what to do next.Current opinion in gastroenterology · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors at 15 institutions in 9 countries.

Na LiCancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1578-9561
Magnus ZethovenCancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Simone McInernyParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Lisa DevereuxLifepool, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2435-5888
Yu-Kuan HuangUpper Gastrointestinal Translational Research Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2262-7069
Niko ThioBioinformatics Core Facility, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Dane CheasleyCancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1170-4690
Sara Gutiérrez-EnríquezHereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO); Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1711-6101
Alejandro Moles-FernándezHereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO); Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
Orland DiezHereditary Cancer Genetics Group, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO); Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, Spain.
Tu Nguyen-DumontPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
Melissa C SoutheyPrecision Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Clayton, Australia.
John L HopperCentre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jacques SimardGenomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6906-3390
Martine DumontGenomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
Penny SoucyGenomics Center, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec - Université Laval Research Center, Quebec, Canada.
Alfons MeindlUniversity of Munich, Campus Großhadern, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Munich, Germany.
Rita SchmutzlerFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany.
Marjanka K SchmidtDivision of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-429X
Muriel A AdankFamily Cancer Clinic, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Irene L AndrulisLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4226-6435
Eric HahnenFaculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Cologne, Germany.
Christoph EngelLeipzig Research Centre for Civilization Diseases, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7247-282X
Fabienne LesueurInserm, U900, Institut Curie, PSL University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7404-4549
Elodie GirardInserm, U900, Institut Curie, PSL University, Mines ParisTech, Paris, France.
Susan L NeuhausenDepartment of Population Sciences, Beckman Research Institute of City of Hope, Duarte, CA, USA.
Elad ZivDepartment of Medicine, University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Jamie AllenCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Douglas F EastonCentre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2444-3247
Rodney J ScottSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7724-3404
Kylie L GorringeSir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5681-2022
Paul A James *Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-4657
Ian G Campbell *Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Vic, Australia. ian.campbell@petermac.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7773-4155
The University of Melbourne · AUThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUCentre hospitalier universitaire de Québec · CAHebron University · PSPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUInserm · FRThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Cologne · DECity of Hope · USHunter Medical Research Institute · AULeipzig University · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

Breast Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA164920 · NCI · CANCER PREVENTION INSTIT OF CALIFORNIA · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE, BUYS, SAUNDRA S · 2012 to 2017
$12.7M
Cancer Research UK 16563EPA EP-C-15-004NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164920
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bi-allelic loss-of-function (LoF) variants in the base excision repair (BER) gene NTHL1 cause a high-risk hereditary multi-tumor syndrome that includes breast cancer, but the contribution of heterozygous variants to hereditary breast cancer is unknown. An analysis of 4985 women with breast cancer, enriched for familial features, and 4786 cancer-free women revealed significant enrichment for NTHL1 LoF variants. Immunohistochemistry confirmed reduced NTHL1 expression in tumors from heterozygous carriers but the NTHL1 bi-allelic loss characteristic mutational signature (SBS 30) was not present. The analysis was extended to 27,421 breast cancer cases and 19,759 controls from 10 international studies revealing 138 cases and 93 controls with a heterozygous LoF variant (OR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.82-1.39) and 316 cases and 179 controls with a missense variant (OR 1.31, 95% CI: 1.09-1.57). Missense variants selected for deleterious features by a number of in silico bioinformatic prediction tools or located within the endonuclease III functional domain showed a stronger association with breast cancer. Somatic sequencing of breast cancers from carriers indicated that the risk associated with NTHL1 appears to operate through haploinsufficiency, consistent with other described low-penetrance breast cancer genes. Data from this very large international multicenter study suggests that heterozygous pathogenic germline coding variants in NTHL1 may be associated with low- to moderate- increased risk of breast cancer.

Identifiers

PMID33980861
PMCPMC8115524
OpenAlexW3160306401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.