Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980816›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2021

Assessment of physicians' resilience level during the COVID-19 pandemic.

D Douillet, A Caillaud, J Riou, P Miroux, E Thibaud, M Noizet, M Oberlin, M Léger, R Mahieu, E Riquin and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The Impact of Physicians' COVID-19 Pandemic Occupational Experiences on Mental Health.Journal of occupational and environmental medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

D DouilletEmergency Department, CHU Angers, Angers, France. Delphine.Douillet@chu-angers.fr.ORCID 0000-0001-7986-7552
A CaillaudEmergency Department, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
J RiouMicro et Nanomedecines Translationnelles, MINT, UNIV Angers, UMR INSERM 1066, UMR CNRS 6021, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7056-9257
P MirouxEmergency Department, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
E ThibaudEmergency Department, Hôpitaux Civils de Colmar, Colmar, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0316-8373
M NoizetEmergency Department, Centre Hospitalier de Mulhouse, Mulhouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9687-6597
M OberlinEmergency Department, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
M LégerAnesthesiology and Intensive Care Department, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
R MahieuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, CHU Angers, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9978-6714
E RiquinUMR (CNRS 6015-INSERM 1083) et Institut MitoVasc, UNIV Angers, Angers, France.
F JavaudinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7728-2320
F MorinEmergency Department, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
T MoumnehEmergency Department, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
D SavaryEmergency Department, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
P-M RoyEmergency Department, CHU Angers, Angers, France.
O HugliEmergency Department, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aim to assess physicians' level of resilience and define factors that improve or decrease the resilience level during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physicians from hospitals located in areas with different COVID-19 caseload levels, were invited to participate in a national e-survey between April and May 2020. Study participants were mainly emergency physicians, and anaesthesiologists, infectious disease consultants, and intensive care. The survey assessed participant's characteristics, factors potentially associated with resilience, and resilience using the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (RISC-25), with higher scores indicative of greater resilience. Factors associated with the resilience score were assessed using a multivariable linear regression. Of 451 responding physicians involved in the care of COVID-19 patients, 442 were included (98%). Age was 36.1 ± 10.3 years and 51.8% were male; 63% worked in the emergency department (n = 282), 10.4% in anesthesiology (n = 46), 9.9% in infectious disease department (n = 44), 4.8% in intensive care unit (n = 21) or other specialties (n = 49). The median RISC-25 score was at 69 (IQR 62-75). Factors associated with higher RISC scores were anesthesia as a specialty, parenthood, no previous history of anxiety or depression and nor increased anxiety. To conclude, this study is the first to characterize levels of resilience among physicians involved in COVID-19 unit. Our data points to certain protective characteristics and some detrimental factors, such as anxiety or depression, that could be amenable to remediating or preventing strategies to promote resilience and support caregivers in a pandemic.

Indexed as

COVID-19PhysiciansResilience, PsychologicalAdultAnxietyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33980816
PMCPMC8114969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.