Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980644›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2021

The Laboratory Diagnosis of Syphilis.

Ferris Satyaputra, Stephanie Hendry, Maxwell Braddick, Pirathaban Sivabalan, Robert Norton

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 207 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Solitary ulcer at the mons pubis in a heterosexual male patient.Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Detection ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ferris SatyaputraPathology Queensland, Townsville Hospital, Douglas, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4232-7293
Stephanie HendryPathology Queensland, Townsville Hospital, Douglas, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Maxwell BraddickDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Townsville Hospital, Douglas, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.
Pirathaban SivabalanDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Robert NortonPathology Queensland, Townsville Hospital, Douglas, Townsville, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-3948-9272
The University of Queensland · AUTownsville Hospital · AUPrincess Alexandra Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syphilis is a multisystem infection caused by the spirochete Treponema pallidum. Currently, cases of possible syphilis are commonly investigated using the treponemal serological tests T. pallidum IgG chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and the T. pallidum particle agglutination (TPPA). The nontreponemal rapid plasma reagin (RPR) flocculation test is used to assess disease activity. There has been a resurgence of syphilis diagnoses in Australia. Large foci of infection have been identified in isolated communities. The remoteness of these locations, in conjunction with the particular sociocultural characteristics of the population, pose unique challenges to the traditional diagnostic and treatment paradigms for syphilis. As a consequence of this increased incidence of syphilis, there has been interest in the utility of point-of-care tests (POCTs), nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), the role of IgM testing in suspected congenital syphilis, and the laboratory investigation of possible neurosyphilis. This review looks at the current status of traditional serological assays and provides an update on more recent methods. It assesses the published literature in this area and makes recommendations for the rational use of pathology testing to aid in the diagnosis of the many facets of syphilis.

Indexed as

NeurosyphilisSyphilisAntibodies, BacterialHumansSyphilis SerodiagnosisTreponema pallidumAntibodies, Bacterialdiagnosticssyphilis

Identifiers

PMID33980644
PMCPMC8451404
OpenAlexW3160045650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.