Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980531›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Modification of maternal late pregnancy sleep position: a survey evaluation of a New Zealand public health campaign.

Robin S Cronin, John M D Thompson, Rennae S Taylor, Jessica Wilson, Karen F Falloon, Sophie Skelton, Elsie Brown, Vicki M Culling, Edwin A Mitchell, Lesley M E McCowan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Robin S CroninDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand r.cronin@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-8304-8004
John M D ThompsonPaediatrics: Child Health and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6944-381X
Rennae S TaylorDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Jessica WilsonPaediatrics: Child Health and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4611-4495
Karen F FalloonGeneral Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Sophie SkeltonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Elsie BrownDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Vicki M CullingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Edwin A MitchellPaediatrics: Child Health and Youth Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Lesley M E McCowanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Maternal Sleep Position Awareness Campaign Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA 'Sleep-On-Side When Baby's Inside' public health campaign was initiated in New Zealand in 2018. This was in response to evidence that maternal supine going-to-sleep position was an independent risk factor for stillbirth from 28 weeks' gestation. We evaluated the success of the campaign on awareness and modification of late pregnancy going-to-sleep position through nationwide surveys. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Two web-based cross-sectional surveys were conducted over 12 weeks in 2019-2020 in a sample of (1) pregnant women ≥28 weeks, primary outcome of going-to-sleep position; and (2) health professionals providing pregnancy care, primary outcome of knowledge of going-to-sleep position and late stillbirth risk. Univariable logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with supine going-to-sleep position. DISCUSSION: The survey of pregnant women comprised 1633 eligible participants. Going-to-sleep position last night was supine (30, 1.8%), non-supine (1597, 97.2%) and no recall (16, 1.0%). Supine position had decreased from 3.9% in our previous New Zealand-wide study (2012-2015). Most women (1412, 86.5%) had received sleep-on-side advice with no major resultant worry (1276, 90.4%). Two-thirds (918, 65.0%) had changed their going-to-sleep position based on advice, with most (611 of 918, 66.5%) reporting little difficulty. Supine position was associated with Māori (OR 5.05, 95% CI 2.10 to 12.1) and Asian-non-Indian (OR 4.20, 95% CI 1.27 to 13.90) ethnicity; single (OR 10.98, 95% CI 4.25 to 28.42) and cohabitating relationship status (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.09 to 6.61); hospital-based maternity provider (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.07 to 6.10); education overseas (OR 3.92, 95% CI 1.09 to 14.09) and primary-secondary level (OR 2.80, 95% CI 1.32 to 6.08); and not receiving sleep-on-side advice (OR 6.70, 95% CI 3.23 to 13.92). The majority of health professionals (709 eligible participants) reported awareness of supine going-to-sleep position and late stillbirth risk (543, 76.6%).

conclusionMost pregnant women had received and implemented sleep-on-side advice without major difficulty or concern. Some groups of women may need a tailored approach to acquisition of going-to-sleep position information.

Indexed as

SleepStillbirthCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PromotionHumansNew ZealandPregnancySupine Positionobstetricspaediatricsprimary carepublic healthsleep medicine

Identifiers

PMID33980531
PMCPMC8118030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.