Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980470›Full record

ArticleCytotherapy2021

Infusion reactions in natural killer cell immunotherapy: a retrospective review.

Tewodros Mamo, Shelly M Williams, Stephanie Kinney, Katelyn M Tessier, Todd E DeFor, Sarah Cooley, Jeffrey S Miller, David H McKenna

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cytotherapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. NK cells as powerful therapeutic tool in cancer immunotherapy.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. A Hot Topic: Cancer Immunotherapy and Natural Killer Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Tewodros MamoDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Shelly M WilliamsDepartment of Pathology and Microbiology, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Stephanie KinneyDivision of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Katelyn M TessierMasonic Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Todd E DeForMasonic Cancer Center Biostatistics Core, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Sarah CooleyFate Therapeutics, San Diego, California, USA.
Jeffrey S MillerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Transplantation, Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
David H McKennaDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA. Electronic address: mcken020@umn.edu.
University of Minnesota · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USFate Therapeutics (United States) · USNebraska Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

Women's CancerP30CA077598 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI Jeffrey S. Miller · 1998 to 2026
$100.4M
Trial Design and Biostatistical Support CoreP01CA065493 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI J SUNIL RAO · 1995 to 2026
$48.2M
Therapeutic Potential of Adaptive NK Cells in Cancer and TransplantationP01CA111412 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI FELICES, MARTIN · 2005 to 2025
$38.2M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCI NIH HHS P01 CA065493NCI NIH HHS P01 CA111412NCI NIH HHS P30 CA077598NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201000008C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND

aimsThe use of natural killer (NK) cells as a cellular immunotherapy has increased over the past decade, specifically in patients with hematologic malignancies. NK cells have been used at the authors' institution for over 15 years. Most patients have a reaction to NK cell infusion. The authors retrospectively analyzed the reactions associated with NK cell infusions to characterize the types of reactions and investigate why some patients have higher-grade reactions than others.

methodsA retrospective chart review of NK cell infusions was performed at the authors' institution under nine clinical protocols from 2008 to 2016. An infusion reaction was defined as any symptom from the time of NK cell infusion up to 4 h after infusion completion. The severity of infusion reactions was graded based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. Two major endpoints of interest were (i) infusion reaction with any symptom and (ii) grade ≥3 infusion reaction. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between variables of interest and outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained for each variable.

resultsA total of 130 patients were receiving NK cell infusions at the authors' institution. The most common reported symptom was chills (n = 110, 85%), which were mostly grade 1 and 2, with only half of patients requiring intervention. There were 118 (91%) patients with infusion reactions, and only 36 (28%) were grade 3. There was one life-threatening grade 4 reaction, and no death was reported due to infusion reaction. Among grade ≥3 reactions, cardiovascular reactions (mainly hypertension) were the most common, and less than half of those with hypertension required intervention. NK cell dose was not associated with any of the grade 3 infusion reactions, whereas monocyte dose was associated with headache (grade ≤3, OR, 2.17, 95% CI, 1.19-3.97) and cardiovascular reaction (grade ≥3, OR, 2.13, 95% CI, 1.13-3.99). Cardiovascular reaction (grade ≥3) was also associated with in vitro IL-2 incubation and storage time. Additionally, there was no association between grade ≥3 infusion reactions and overall response rate (OR, 0.75, 95% CI, 0.29-1.95).

conclusionsThe majority of patients who receive NK cell therapy experience grade 1 or 2 infusion reactions. Some patients experience grade 3 reactions, which are mainly cardiovascular, suggesting that close monitoring within the first 4 h is beneficial. The association of monocytes with NK cell infusion reaction relates to toxicities seen in adoptive T-cell therapy and needs further exploration.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalHumansImmunotherapy, AdoptiveRetrospective Studiesadverse eventscell therapyimmunotherapyinfusion reactionNK cellstoxicity

Identifiers

PMID33980470
PMCPMC8217213
OpenAlexW3160283912

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.