Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980324›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2021

Prevalence and incidence of venous leg ulcers-a protocol for a systematic review.

S Probst, C D Weller, P Bobbink, C Saini, M Pugliese, Monika Buehrer Skinner, G Gethin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Direct metagenomics investigation of non-surgical hard-to-heal wounds: a review.Annals of clinical microbiology and antimicrobials · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. No More Venous Ulcers-What More Can We Do?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Microbiological Status of Venous Leg Ulcers and Its Predictors: A Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S ProbstHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, School of Health Sciences, Avenue de Champel 47, 1206, Geneva, Switzerland. sebastian.probst@hesge.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-9603-1570
C D WellerDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, The Alfred Hospital, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
P BobbinkHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva School of Health Sciences, Geneva, Switzerland.
C SainiHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva School of Health Sciences, Geneva, Switzerland.
M PuglieseHES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva School of Health Sciences, Geneva, Switzerland.
Monika Buehrer SkinnerInstitute of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention, Director of Public Health Education Program, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
G GethinSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Aras Moyola, NUI Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVenous leg ulcers (VLUs) are chronic wounds characterized by slow healing and high recurrence. Information on prevalence and incidence is essential for ascertaining the burden of VLU on the health care system and to inform epidemiological research, priority setting, and health care planning. The objective of this protocol is to present a transparent process for how we plan to review the existing international literature on the prevalence and incidence of VLU as well as the characteristics of the population reported within these studies.

methodsAn exploratory search was performed using MEDLINE via PubMed and CINHAL via Ebsco to identify concepts, keywords, MeSH terms, and headings to identify study types looking at data of VLU prevalence and/or incidence and related patient characteristics. The findings of this exploratory search will determine the final search strategy. The titles and abstracts of the identified articles will be screened independently be two authors for relevance. Study which pass the quality assessment will be included. Data extraction will be performed independently by two authors and in accordance with a pre-designed data extraction form. If the data allows, a meta-analysis will be performed otherwise a descriptive summary of the findings will be conducted. DISCUSSION: The results of this review will contribute to the evidence base on VLU occurrence and may inform the decision making of healthcare professionals, policy-makers, and consumers. It will also inform future research in this area of VLU care. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020205855.

Indexed as

Varicose UlcerEpidemiologic StudiesHumansIncidenceMeta-Analysis as TopicPrevalenceSystematic Reviews as TopicWound HealingEpidemiologyIncidencePrevalenceVenous leg ulcer

Identifiers

PMID33980324
PMCPMC8117489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.