Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980271›Full record

ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2021

Vaccination strategy and anti - SARS-CoV-2 S titers in healthcare workers of the INT - IRCCS "Fondazione Pascale" Cancer Center (Naples, Italy).

Ernesta Cavalcanti, Maria Antonietta Isgrò, Domenica Rea, Lucia Di Capua, Giusy Trillò, Luigi Russo, Gerardo Botti, Leonardo Miscio, Franco Maria Buonaguro, Attilio Antonio Montano Bianchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Emerging strategies for nanomedicine in autoimmunity.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Lipid Nanoparticle Delivery of Small Proteins for PotentACS applied materials & interfaces · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ernesta CavalcantiDivision of Laboratory Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy. e.cavalcanti@istitutotumori.na.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6302-1579
Maria Antonietta IsgròDivision of Laboratory Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Domenica ReaDivision of Laboratory Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Lucia Di CapuaDivision of Laboratory Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Giusy TrillòSpecialization School in Clinical Pathology and Clinical Biochemistry, School of Medicine and Surgery, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy.
Luigi RussoDivision of Laboratory Medicine, Istituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Gerardo BottiIstituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Leonardo MiscioIstituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Franco Maria BuonaguroIstituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Attilio Antonio Montano BianchiIstituto Nazionale Tumori - IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Napoli, Italy.
Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS "Fondazione G. Pascale" · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute Ricerca Corrente 2021Regione Campania COVID-19 DRG N.140/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and the resulting disease, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), have spread to millions of people globally, requiring the development of billions of different vaccine doses. The SARS-CoV-2 spike mRNA vaccine (named BNT162b2/Pfizer), authorized by the FDA, has shown high efficacy in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection after administration of two doses in individuals 16 years of age and older. In the present study, we retrospectively evaluated the differences in the SARS-CoV-2 humoral immune response after vaccine administration in the two different cohorts of workers at the INT - IRCCS "Fondazione Pascale" Cancer Center (Naples, Italy): previously infected to SARS-CoV-2 subjects and not infected to SARS-CoV-2 subjects.

methodsWe determined specific anti-RBD (receptor-binding domain) titers against trimeric spike glycoprotein (S) of SARS-CoV-2 by Roche Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S immunoassay in serum samples of 35 healthcare workers with a previous documented history of SARS-CoV-2 infection and 158 healthcare workers without, after 1 and 2 doses of vaccine, respectively. Moreover, geometric mean titers and relative fold changes (FC) were calculated.

resultsBoth previously infected and not infected to SARS-CoV-2 subjects developed significant immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 after the administration of 1 and 2 doses of vaccine, respectively. Anti-S antibody responses to the first dose of vaccine were significantly higher in previously SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects in comparison to titers of not infected subjects after the first as well as the second dose of vaccine. Fold changes for subjects previously infected to SARS-CoV-2 was very modest, given the high basal antibody titer, as well as the upper limit of 2500.0 BAU/mL imposed by the Roche methods. Conversely, for naïve subjects, mean fold change following the first dose was low ([Formula: see text] =1.6), reaching 3.8 FC in 72 subjects (45.6%) following the second dose.

conclusionsThe results showed that, as early as the first dose, SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals developed a remarkable and statistically significant immune response in comparison to those who did not contract the virus previously, suggesting the possibility of administering only one dose in previously SARS-CoV-2-infected subjects. FC for previously infected subjects should not be taken into account for the generally high pre-vaccination values. Conversely, FC for not infected subjects, after the second dose, were = 3.8 in > 45.0% of vaccinees, and ≤ 3.1 in 19.0%, the latter showing a potential susceptibility to further SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Indexed as

Antibody responseAnti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccinationAnti-spike serologyBeads-based linear serologyCancer institutePost-COVID-19 single dose vaccine.SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33980271
PMCPMC8114024
OpenAlexW3137164376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.