Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980252›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2021

Nahua biocultural richness: an ethnoherpetological perspective.

Miriam Itzel Linares-Rosas, Benigno Gómez, Elda Miriam Aldasoro-Maya, Alejandro Casas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Understandings and critiques of biocultural diversity conservation and future recommendations for conservation actors.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Miriam Itzel Linares-RosasEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur, ECOSUR, Carretera Panamericana y Periférico Sur s/n Barrio María Auxiliadora, 29290, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico.
Benigno GómezEl Colegio de la Frontera Sur, ECOSUR, Carretera Panamericana y Periférico Sur s/n Barrio María Auxiliadora, 29290, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico.
Elda Miriam Aldasoro-MayaCONACYT-El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, ECOSUR, Carretera Panamericana y Periférico Sur s/n Barrio María Auxiliadora, 29290, San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico.
Alejandro CasasInstituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, IIES, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico. acasas@cieco.unam.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8181-5118

Funding

CONACYT A1-S-14306Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México IN206520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMexico harbours one of the greatest biocultural diversities of the world, where multiple social and natural elements and systems form complex networks of interactions in which both culture and nature are mutually influenced. Biocultural states and processes are studied by ethnosciences, among them ethnoherpetology, which seeks understanding material and non-material expressions of the interactions between humans, amphibians, and reptiles. Herpetofauna has been part of the magic-religious world and source of goods for Mesoamerican cultures. This study aims to document and analyse the complex body of knowledge, beliefs, and practices on these vertebrates in the Nahua culture, the factors that have influenced progressive risk and loss of culture, habitat, and species, and the potential contribution of contemporary Nahua knowledge to biocultural conservation.

methodsThrough 15 workshops with children and young people, and 16 semi-structured interviews to people 27 to 74 years old, we documented the contemporary Nahua knowledge in the communities of Aticpac and Xaltepec in the Sierra Negra, Puebla, central Mexico. Biological and ecological knowledge, use, management practices, legends, and perceptions on herpetofauna were emphasised in the study.

resultsWe obtained an ethnoherpetological checklist, grouping species into four general classificatory categories: kohuatl (serpents), kalatl (frogs and toads), ayotsi (turtles), and ketzo (lizards and salamanders), which included 21, 10, 1, and 11 ethnocategories respectively, based on the local Nahua knowledge of herpetofauna. Serpents, used as medicine, are the most culturally relevant. Due to perceptions of danger, beliefs, and actual snake bites, the main interaction with serpents is their elimination; however, some snakes are tolerated and maintained in captivity. The remaining species of local herpetofauna recorded are tolerated. Cultural aspects of reptiles and amphibians in the Nahua worldview were documented to influence the regulation of interactions of people with these vertebrates, but for younger generations, such aspects are less frequent or absent.

conclusionsInteractions and cultural relationships between the Nahua people, amphibians and reptiles are complex, maintaining some aspects of the local worldview but also influenced by external factors and being constantly recreated and re-signified. Documenting and understanding the contemporary relations is essential to generate strategies in biocultural conservation of herpetofauna.

Indexed as

AmphibiansConservation of Natural ResourcesReptilesAnimalsEcosystemEthnicityHumansKnowledgeMexicoSnakesEthnozoologyHerpetofaunaNahua contemporary knowledgeSierra NegraTehuacan-Cuicatlán Valley

Identifiers

PMID33980252
PMCPMC8115869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.