Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980242›Full record

SynthesisBMC palliative care2021

Bereavement interventions to support informal caregivers in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.

Stephana J Moss, Krista Wollny, Therese G Poulin, Deborah J Cook, Henry T Stelfox, Amanda Roze des Ordons, Kirsten M Fiest

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC palliative care, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Comfort, benefit, and distress: An exploratory study of research experiences of bereaved parents in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Communication with bereaved family members after death in the ICU: the CATHARTIC randomised clinical trial.Critical care and resuscitation : journal of the Australasian Academy of Critical Care Medicine · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephana J MossDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Krista WollnyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Therese G PoulinDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Deborah J CookDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Henry T StelfoxDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Amanda Roze des Ordons *Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Kirsten M Fiest *Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada. kmfiest@ucalgary.ca.
Alberta Health Services · CAUniversity of Calgary · CAImpact · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformal caregivers of critically ill patients in intensive care unit (ICUs) experience negative psychological sequelae that worsen after death. We synthesized outcomes reported from ICU bereavement interventions intended to improve informal caregivers' ability to cope with grief. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO from inception to October 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of bereavement interventions to support informal caregivers of adult patients who died in ICU. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate. Narrative synthesis was conducted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Bereavement interventions were categorized according to the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence three-tiered model of bereavement support according to the level of need: (1) Universal information provided to all those bereaved; (2) Selected or targeted non-specialist support provided to those who are at-risk of developing complex needs; and/or (3) Professional specialist interventions provided to those with a high level of complex needs. Outcome measures were synthesized according to core outcomes established for evaluating bereavement support for adults who have lost other adults to illness.

resultsThree studies of ICU bereavement interventions from 31 ICUs across 26 hospitals were included. One trial examining the effect of family presence at brain death assessment integrated all three categories of support but did not report significant improvement in emotional or psychological distress. Two other trials assessed a condolence letter intervention, which did not decrease grief symptoms and may have increased symptoms of depression and post-traumatic stress disorder, and a storytelling intervention that found no significant improvements in anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress, or complicated grief. Four of nine core bereavement outcomes were not assessed anytime in follow-up.

conclusionsCurrently available trial evidence is sparse and does not support the use of bereavement interventions for informal caregivers of critically ill patients who die in the ICU.

Indexed as

BereavementCaregiversAdultAnxietyGriefHumansIntensive Care UnitsBereavementCopingCritical careInformal caregiverIntensive care unitInterventions

Identifiers

PMID33980242
PMCPMC8117265
OpenAlexW3162556283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.