Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980178›Full record

ArticleBMC anesthesiology2021

A case report of individualized ventilation in a COVID-19 patient - new possibilities and caveats to consider with flow-controlled ventilation.

Patrick Spraider, Gabriel Putzer, Robert Breitkopf, Julia Abram, Simon Mathis, Bernhard Glodny, Judith Martini

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrick SpraiderDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria. patrick.spraider@i-med.ac.at.
Gabriel PutzerDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Robert BreitkopfDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Julia AbramDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Simon MathisDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard GlodnyDepartment of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Judith MartiniDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Innsbruck Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlow-controlled ventilation (FCV) is a novel ventilation method increasingly being used clinically, particularly during the current COVID-19 pandemic. However, the continuous flow pattern in FCV during inspiration and expiration has a significant impact on respiratory parameters and ventilatory settings compared to conventional ventilation modes. In addition, the constant flow combined with direct intratracheal pressure measurement allows determination of dynamic compliance and ventilation settings can be adjusted accordingly, reflecting a personalized ventilation approach. CASE PRESENTATION: A 50-year old women with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) was admitted to a tertiary medical center. Initial ventilation occurred with best standard of care pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and was then switched to FCV, by adopting PCV ventilator settings. This led to an increase in oxygenation by 30 %. Subsequently, to reduce invasiveness of mechanical ventilation, FCV was individualized by dynamic compliance guided adjustment of both, positive end-expiratory pressure and peak pressure; this intervention reduced driving pressure from 18 to 12 cm H

conclusionsAn individualized FCV approach increased oxygenation parameters in a patient suffering from severe COVID-19 related ARDS. Direct intratracheal pressure measurements allow for determination of dynamic compliance and thus optimization of ventilator settings, thereby reducing applied and dissipated energy. However, although desirable, this personalized ventilation strategy may reach its limits when lung function is so severely impaired that patient's oxygenation has to be ensured at the expense of lung protective ventilation concepts.

Indexed as

Air PressureComplianceCOVID-19FemaleHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMiddle AgedPositive-Pressure RespirationPrecision MedicineRespiration, ArtificialRespiratory Distress SyndromeRespiratory MechanicsStress, MechanicalTomography, X-Ray ComputedVentilators, MechanicalCase ReportCOVID-19Lung ComplianceRespiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultStress Mechanical

Identifiers

PMID33980178
PMCPMC8113787
OpenAlexW3162671255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.