ArticleBMC geriatrics2021
The frequency and quality of delirium documentation in discharge summaries.
Article in BMC geriatrics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Pleasantly confused" and missed opportunities for delirium recognition: A hospital record audit.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Multidimensional Occupational Therapy Environmental Checklist for People Experiencing Delirium During Hospital Admission: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Australasian journal on ageing · 2026Article
- UnderstandingDelirium.ca: A Mixed-Methods Observational Evaluation of an Internet-Based Educational Intervention for the Public and Care Partners.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Validating adverse events in administrative healthcare data in ireland: a retrospective chart review study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Association of Central Nervous System-Related Biomarkers With Hospital Delirium in Patients With Respiratory Failure in the ICU.CHEST critical care · 2025Article
- Determining the ground truth for the prediction of delirium in adult patients in acute care: a scoping review.JAMIA open · 2025Review
- A retrospective cohort study of hospital discharge instructions following delirium episodes.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2025Article
- Validation of a viable delirium detection test performed by nurses and physicians during routine patient care.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Short-Term Effect of Quetiapine Used to Treat Delirium Symptoms on Opioid and Benzodiazepine Requirements in the Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- Delirium is frequently underdiagnosed among older hospitalised patients despite available information in hospital medical records.Age and ageing · 2024Article
- Identification and information management of cognitive impairment of patients in acute care hospitals: An integrative review.International journal of nursing sciences · 2024Review
- Delirium is under-reported in discharge summaries and in hospital administrative systems: a systematic review.Delirium (Bielefeld, Germany) · 2023Article
- Proposing a Scientific and Technological Approach to the Summaries of Clinical Issues of Inpatient Elderly with Delirium: A Viewpoint.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Assessing the Accuracy of International Classification of Diseases (ICD) Coding for Delirium.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommends documenting all delirium episodes in the discharge summary using the term "delirium". Previous studies demonstrate poor delirium documentation rates in discharge summaries and no studies have assessed delirium documentation quality. The aim of this study was to determine the frequency and quality of delirium documentation in discharge summaries and explore differences between medical and surgical services.
methodsThis was a multi-center retrospective chart review. We included 110 patients aged ≥ 65 years identified to have delirium during their hospitalization using the Chart-based Delirium Identification Instrument (CHART-DEL). We assessed the frequency of any delirium documentation in discharge summaries, and more specifically, for the term "delirium". We evaluated the quality of delirium discharge documentation using the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organization's framework for quality discharge summaries. Comparisons were made between medical and surgical services. Secondary outcomes included assessing factors influencing the frequency of "delirium" being documented in the discharge summary.
resultsWe identified 110 patients with sufficient chart documentation to identify delirium and 80.9 % of patients had delirium documented in their discharge summary ("delirium" or other acceptable term). The specific term "delirium" was reported in 63.6 % of all delirious patients and more often by surgical than medical specialties (76.5 % vs. 52.5 %, p = 0.02). Documentation quality was significantly lower by surgical specialties in reporting delirium as a diagnosis (23.5 % vs. 57.6 %, p < 0.001), documenting delirium workup (23.4 % vs. 57.6 %, p = 0.001), etiology (43.3 % vs. 70.4 %, p = 0.03), treatment (36.7 % vs. 66.7 %, p = 0.02), medication changes (44.4 % vs. 100 %, p = 0.002) and follow-up (36.4 % vs. 88.2 %, p = 0.01).
conclusionsThe frequency of delirium documentation is higher than previously reported but remains subpar. Medical services document delirium with higher quality, but surgical specialties document the term "delirium" more frequently. The documentation of delirium in discharge summaries must improve to meet quality standards.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.