ArticleBMC microbiology2021
Insights into the endophytic bacterial community comparison and their potential role in the dimorphic seeds of halophyte Suaeda glauca.
Article in BMC microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Seed-borne bacteria-mediated seedling microbiome assembly: genetic and metabolic mechanisms of salt tolerance.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Seed Germination as an Adaptive Response in Halophytes.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Microbial Life Inside Posidonia Seeds: Beneficial Endophytes and Implications for Marine Plant Health.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Article
- Integrated 16 S rRNA and transcriptome analysis reveal molecular and microbial mechanisms of cold-tolerant germination in hulless barley.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- The seed microbiota from an application perspective: an underexplored frontier in plant-microbe interactions.Crop health · 2025Review
- Endophytic Diversity inBiology · 2025Article
- Changes in the community composition and function of the rhizosphere microbiome in tobacco plants withFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Plant developmental stage drives the assembly and functional adaptability of endophytic microbial communities.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Diversity and potential plant growth promoting capacity of seed endophytic bacteria of the holoparasite Cistanche phelypaea (Orobanchaceae).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Endorhizosphere of indigenous succulent halophytes: a valuable resource of plant growth promoting bacteria.Environmental microbiome · 2023Article
- Dynamic changes in the endophytic bacterial community during maturation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeed dimorphism has been thought to be a bet-hedging strategy that helps plants survive in the disturbed environment and has been widely studied for its ecological adaptation mechanism. Many studies showed that seed-associated microorganisms play an important role in enhancing plant fitness, but information regarding endophytic bacteria associated with dimorphic seeds is limited. This study explores the influence of seed coat structure and seed phytochemical properties on the community composition and diversity of endophytic bacteria of dimorphic seeds of Suaeda glauca. In this study, we used 16S rRNA high-throughput gene sequencing method to compare the community composition and bacterial diversity between brown and black seeds of Suaeda glauca.
resultsA significant difference was observed in seed coat structure and phytochemical properties between brown and black seeds of S. glauca. Total 9 phyla, 13 classes, 31 orders, 53 families, 102 genera were identified in the dimorphic seeds. The dominant phyla were Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Actinobacteria. The results showed that seed dimorphism had little impact on the diversity and richness of endophytic bacterial communities but significantly differs in the relative abundance of the bacterial community between brown and black seeds. At the phylum level, Actinobacteria tend to be enriched significantly in brown seeds. At the genus level, Rhodococcus, Ralstonia, Pelomonas and Bradyrhizobium tend to be enriched significantly in brown seeds, while Marinilactibacillus was mainly found in black seeds. Besides, brown seeds harbored a large number of bacteria with plant-growth-promoting traits, whereas black seeds presented bacteria with enzyme activities (i.e., pectinase, cellulolytic and xylanolytic activities).
conclusionThe endophytic bacterial community compositions were significantly different between dimorphic seeds of Suaeda glauca, and play an important role in the ecological adaptation of dimorphic seeds by performing different biological function roles. The endophytic bacterial communities of the dimorphic seeds may be influenced mainly by the seed coat structureand partly by the seed phytochemical characteristics. These findings provide valuable information for better understanding of the ecological adaptation strategy of dimorphic seeds in the disturbed environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.