Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33980095›Full record

ArticleQualitative health research2021

Understanding Gut Feelings: Transformations in Coping With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Among Young Adults.

Jan Gelech, Michel Desjardins, Kathrina Mazurik, Kari Duerksen, Kevin McGuigan-Scott, Kristy Lichtenwald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Qualitative health research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jan GelechUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9464-3960
Michel DesjardinsUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Kathrina MazurikUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Kari DuerksenUniversity of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Kevin McGuigan-ScottUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Kristy LichtenwaldUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Past studies have revealed a dizzying array of coping techniques employed by persons living with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Unfortunately, research has provided little insight into when and why individuals adopt or abandon particular coping strategies. Using a retrospective narrative approach, we explored how participants made sense of changes in their approach to coping over time. Shifts in coping strategies were associated with particular illness experiences that wrought new understandings of IBD and novel identity challenges. They followed a common processual form and were marked by a movement away from techniques of purification, normalization, and banalization toward the development of a more communicative body. This was accompanied by notable shifts in identity work. Notably, participants moved from a preoccupation with maintaining continuity and sameness to permitting their extraordinary bodies to occupy a place in their public and personal identities. Implications of this process for theory and practice are discussed.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalInflammatory Bowel DiseasesEmotionsHumansNarrationRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultCanadachangecopingidentityinflammatory bowel diseasequalitative researchyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID33980095
PMCPMC8446882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.