Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33979764›Full record

ArticlePsychiatry research2021

Quality versus quantity: Determining real-world social functioning deficits in schizophrenia.

Danielle B Abel, Michelle P Salyers, Wei Wu, Mahogany A Monette, Kyle S Minor

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychiatry research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Anhedonia in Schizophrenia.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielle B AbelDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, LD 124, 402N Blackford St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States. Electronic address: dbeaudet@iu.edu.
Michelle P SalyersDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, LD 124, 402N Blackford St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Wei WuDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, LD 124, 402N Blackford St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Mahogany A MonetteDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, LD 124, 402N Blackford St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
Kyle S MinorDepartment of Psychology, Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis, LD 124, 402N Blackford St, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States.
University of Indianapolis · US

Funding

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteKL2TR001106 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001106NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social dysfunction is a hallmark of schizophrenia that is associated with emotional disturbances. Researchers have employed ecological momentary assessment (EMA) to measure social and emotional functioning in people with schizophrenia. Yet, few studies have evaluated quality of real-world social interactions, and it is unclear how interactions impact emotional experiences in this population. Using novel EMA that passively collects audio data, we examined daily social behavior and emotion in schizophrenia (n = 38) and control (n = 36) groups. Contrary to hypotheses, both groups interacted with others at the same rate and exhibited similar levels of positive emotion. However, as expected, the schizophrenia group exhibited significantly less high-quality interactions and reported more negative emotion than controls. Social versus non-social context did not influence experienced emotion in either group. This is the first real-world study to passively assess quality of social interactions in schizophrenia. Although those with schizophrenia did not differ in their number of interactions, they were less likely to engage in substantive, personal conversations. Because high-quality interactions are linked with better social outcomes, this finding has important potential treatment implications. Future research should investigate quality of interactions across different types of social activities to gain a more nuanced understanding of social dysfunction in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaAffective SymptomsEcological Momentary AssessmentHumansSocial AdjustmentSocial InteractionEcological momentary assessmentEmotionSchizophreniaSocial functioning

Identifiers

PMID33979764
PMCPMC8206017
OpenAlexW3158517593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.