Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33979403›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Safety, effectiveness and costs of percutaneous mitral valve repair: A real-world prospective study.

Iain Willits, Kim Keltie, Mark de Belder, Robert Henderson, Nicholas Linker, Hannah Patrick, Helen Powell, Lee Berry, Julie Speller, Samuel G Urwin and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Findings from transoesophageal echocardiographic follow-up after mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Iain WillitsThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Kim KeltieThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Mark de BelderNational Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research (NICOR), Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Robert HendersonNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Nicholas LinkerSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2592-0757
Hannah PatrickNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London, United Kingdom.
Helen PowellNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Lee BerryNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Manchester, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1183-9699
Julie SpellerNational Casemix Office, NHS Digital, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Samuel G UrwinThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Helen ColeThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Andrew J SimsThe Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9553-7278
Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBNHS Digital · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsPercutaneous mitral valve leaflet repair is a treatment option for some people with severe mitral valve regurgitation for whom conventional mitral valve surgery is clinically inappropriate. This study aimed to determine the safety, efficacy, and costs of percutaneous mitral valve leaflet repair, using the MitraClip device in a UK setting. METHODS AND

resultsThis was a prospective, single-armed registry with a follow-up of 2 years that reported a range of procedural, clinical and patient-orientated outcomes. Registry data were linked to routine data sources to allow for more comprehensive follow up concerning mortality and healthcare resource use. The registry received data for 199 mainly elective patients with mixed mitral regurgitation aetiology. A MitraClip device was implanted in 187 patients (94%), with a procedural success rate of 86%, with 8% of patients having a serious in-hospital adverse event (including 5% mortality). Percutaneous mitral valve leaflet repair reduced mitral regurgitation from 100% MR grade ≥ 3+ to 7% at discharge. There were corresponding improvements in New York Heart Association functional class, reducing from 92% (class ≥ 3) at baseline to 18% at 6 weeks. There were significant improvements in generic and disease specific quality of life indicators up to 2 years. The all-cause mortality rate was estimated to be 12.7% (95% CI 7.5 to 17.7%) at 1 year. Percutaneous mitral valve leaflet repair was associated with reduced hospital readmissions and potential cost-savings in post-procedural care.

conclusionThis study shows that percutaneous mitral valve leaflet repair using MitraClip is a relatively safe and effective treatment in patients unable to tolerate surgery and has the potential to reduce ongoing healthcare costs in the UK.

Indexed as

Heart Valve ProsthesisAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Care CostsHeart Valve Prosthesis ImplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedMitral ValveMitral Valve InsufficiencyProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33979403
PMCPMC8115844
OpenAlexW3163902481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.