Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33979383›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

'If relevant, yes; if not, no': General practitioner (GP) users and GP perceptions about asking ethnicity questions in Irish general practice: A qualitative analysis using Normalization Process Theory.

Maria Roura, Joseph W LeMaster, Ailish Hannigan, Anna Papyan, Sharon McCarthy, Diane Nurse, Nazmy Villarroel, Anne MacFarlane

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Use of ethnic identifiers to narrow health inequality gaps.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Maria RouraSchool of Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Joseph W LeMasterKansas University Family Medicine Research, University of Kansas Medical Centre, The University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-3026-830X
Ailish HanniganSchool of Medicine & Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Anna PapyanShannon Family Resource Centre, Shannon, Ireland.
Sharon McCarthyShannon Family Resource Centre, Shannon, Ireland.
Diane NurseNational Office for Social Inclusion, Health Service Executive, Dublin, Ireland.
Nazmy VillarroelDepartment of Sociological Studies, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.
Anne MacFarlaneSchool of Medicine & Health Research Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9708-5025
Shannon Applied Biotechnology Centre · IEUniversity of Limerick · IEHealth Service Executive · IEUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity of Kansas · USUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextThe use of ethnic identifiers in health systems is recommended in several European countries as a means to identify and address heath inequities. There are barriers to implementation that have not been researched.

objectiveThis study examines whether and how ethnicity data can be collected in Irish general practices in a meaningful and acceptable way.

methodsQualitative case study data generation was informed by Normalization Process Theory (NPT) constructs about 'sense' making and 'engagement'. It consisted of individual interviews and focus group discussions based on visual participatory techniques. There were 70 informants, including 62 general practitioner (GP) users of diverse ethnic backgrounds recruited through community organisations and eight GPs identified through an inter-agency steering group. Data were analysed according to principles of thematic analysis using NPT.

resultsThe link between ethnicity and health was often considered relevant because GP users grasped connections with genetic (skin colour, lactose intolerance), geographic (prevalence of disease, early years exposure), behavioural (culture/food) and social determinant (housing) factors. The link was less clear with religion. There was some scepticism and questions about how the collection of data would benefit GP consultations and concerns regarding confidentiality and the actual uses of these data (e.g. risk of discrimination, social control). For GPs, the main theme discussed was relevance: what added value would it bring to their consultations and was it was their role to collect these data? Their biggest concern was about data protection issues in light of the European Union (EU) General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The difficulty in explaining a complex concept such as 'ethnicity' in the limited time available in consultations was also worrying.

conclusionsImplementation of an ethnicity identifier in Irish general practices will require a strong rationale that makes sense to GP users, and specific measures to ensure that its benefits outweigh any potential harm. This is in line with both our participants' views and the EU GDPR.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelClinical CompetenceData CollectionEthnicityFamily PracticeFocus GroupsGeneral PracticeGeneral PractitionersHumansIrelandPerceptionQualitative ResearchReferral and Consultation

Identifiers

PMID33979383
PMCPMC8115799
OpenAlexW3163791464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.