ArticleDento maxillo facial radiology2021
In vitro comparison of high-definition US, CBCT and periapical radiography in the diagnosis of proximal and recurrent caries.
Article in Dento maxillo facial radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- CBCT in Dental Research: Is Complexity Necessary? An Exploratory Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Comparative Analysis of Artifact Expression in Zirconia and Graphene Crowns in CBCT Images From Different Systems.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
- CBCT: knowledge, attitude, and practice among dentists.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Tooth numbering with polygonal segmentation on periapical radiographs: an artificial intelligence study.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Optimal Training Positive Sample Size Determination for Deep Learning with a Validation on CBCT Image Caries Recognition.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Evaluating the effect of amalgam fillings on caries detection in cone-beam computed tomography images.Dental research journal · 2024Article
- The Detection of Dental Pathologies on Periapical Radiographs-Results from a Reliability Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the effect of amalgam fillings on the diagnosis of proximal caries using cone-beam computed tomography technique.Dental research journal · 2023Article
- Detecting Proximal Caries on Periapical Radiographs Using Convolutional Neural Networks with Different Training Strategies on Small Datasets.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess the
methodsA total of 240 molar teeth were divided into eight groups each comprised of 30 teeth. Control groups consisted of teeth without caries (Group 1-4;
resultsIntraobserver agreement for both readings for the four observers ranged between 0.848 and 0.988 for CBCT (0.075 mm) images; 0.658 and 0.952 for CBCT (0.2 mm) images; 0.555 and 0.810 for periapical images; 0.427 and 0.676 for US images. Highest AUC values were found for CBCT (0.075 mm) images and lowest for US images. Statistically significant differences were found among CBCT (0.075 mm) images and US images (
conclusionPeriapical and CBCT images outperformed HD US imaging in the detection of proximal dental caries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.