Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33979028›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2021

A narrow window for geographic cline analysis using genomic data: Effects of age, drift, and migration on error rates.

Gaston I Jofre, Gil G Rosenthal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gaston I JofreDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, TAMU, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8670-5236
Gil G RosenthalDepartment of Biology, Texas A&M University, TAMU, College Station, TX, USA.

Funding

The prevalence of genetic introgression in speciationR01GM121750 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI MATUTE, DANIEL · 2017 to 2021
$1.7M
Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y TecnologíaNational Science Foundation: NSF 1354172National Science Foundation: NSF 1755327NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM121750NIH HHS R01GM121750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of genomic and phenotypic data to scan for outliers is a mainstay for studies of hybridization and speciation. Geographic cline analysis of natural hybrid zones is widely used to identify putative signatures of selection by detecting deviations from baseline patterns of introgression. As with other outlier-based approaches, demographic histories can make neutral regions appear to be under selection and vice versa. In this study, we use a forward-time individual-based simulation approach to evaluate the robustness of geographic cline analysis under different evolutionary scenarios. We modelled multiple stepping-stone hybrid zones with distinct age, deme sizes, and migration rates, and evolving under different types of selection. We found that drift distorts cline shapes and increases false positive rates for signatures of selection. This effect increases with hybrid zone age, particularly if migration between demes is low. Drift can also distort the signature of deleterious effects of hybridization, with genetic incompatibilities and particularly underdominance prone to spurious typing as adaptive introgression. Our results suggest that geographic clines are most useful for outlier analysis in young hybrid zones with large populations of hybrid individuals. Current approaches may overestimate adaptive introgression and underestimate selection against maladaptive genotypes.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsBiological EvolutionGenetics, PopulationGenotypeHumansHybridization, Geneticconservation geneticsecological genomicsoutlier analysisspatial analysis

Identifiers

PMID33979028
PMCPMC11586622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.