Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33978923›Full record

SynthesisNeurosurgical review2022

Medial thalamotomy using stereotactic radiosurgery for intractable pain: a systematic review.

Andrea Franzini, Zefferino Rossini, Shayan Moosa, Maria Pia Tropeano, Davide Milani, Luca Attuati, Elena Clerici, Pierina Navarria, Federico Pessina, Piero Picozzi

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Neuroablative central lateral thalamotomy for chronic neuropathic pain.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  9. Case report: MR-guided laser induced thermal therapy for palliative cingulotomy.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrea FranziniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy. andrea.franzini1@hotmail.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2031-4547
Zefferino RossiniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Shayan MoosaDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health Science Center, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Maria Pia TropeanoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Davide MilaniDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Luca AttuatiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Elena ClericiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Pierina NavarriaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Federico PessinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
Piero PicozziDepartment of Neurosurgery, Humanitas Research Hospital IRCCS, via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medial thalamotomy using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a potential treatment for intractable pain. However, the ideal treatment parameters and expected outcomes from this procedure remain unclear. The aim of this systematic review is to provide further insights on medial thalamotomy using SRS, specifically for intractable pain. A systematic review was performed to identify all clinical articles discussing medial thalamotomy using SRS for intractable pain. Only studies in which SRS was used to target the medial thalamus for pain were included. For centers with multiple publications, care was taken to avoid recounting individual patients. The literature review revealed six studies describing outcomes of medial thalamotomy using SRS for a total of 125 patients (118 included in the outcome analysis). Fifty-two patients were treated for cancer pain across three studies, whereas five studies included 73 patients who were treated for nonmalignant pain. The individual studies demonstrated initial meaningful pain reduction in 43.3-100% of patients, with an aggregate initial meaningful pain reduction in 65 patients (55%) following SRS medial thalamotomy. This effect persisted in 45 patients (38%) at the last follow-up. Adverse events were observed in six patients (5%), which were related to radiation in five patients (4%). Medial thalamotomy using SRS is effective for select patients with treatment-resistant pain and is remarkably safe when modern radiation delivery platforms are used. More posteriorly placed lesions within the medial thalamus were associated with better pain relief. More studies are warranted to shed light on differences in patient responses.

Indexed as

Cancer PainIntractable PainRadiosurgeryHumansRetrospective StudiesThalamusTreatment OutcomeGamma KnifeMasepNovalisPainRadiosurgeryThalamotomy

Identifiers

PMID33978923
OpenAlexW3161144026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.